• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种关于克拉霉素对健康志愿者口腔和鼻腔微生物群影响的药代动力学/药效学方法。

A PK/PD approach on the effects of clarithromycin against oral and nasal microbiota of healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Del Bortolo Ruenis A P, Nobre Franco G C, Baglie S, Lopes Motta R H, Simões R P, Rosalen P L, Franco L M, Moreno R A, Abib E, Groppo F C

机构信息

Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):96-103. doi: 10.5414/cpp47096.

DOI:10.5414/cpp47096
PMID:19203565
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin (CLR) and its effects on oral and nasal microbiota in healthy volunteers in an open, randomized, two-period crossover design.

METHODS

A single 500 mg oral dose of CLR (Group 1: Merck; Group 2: Klaricid) was administered observing a 1-week interval between doses. Blood samples were collected from pre-dose to 24 h. Plasmatic concentrations of CLR were quantified by the LC-MS-MS method. Saliva and nasal mucosa swabs were obtained previously and after 1.33, 2, 6 and 12 h of drug administration. Pharmacokinetics and PK/PD (t > MIC, %t > MIC and AUC0-24/MIC ratio) parameters were estimated. The microorganism counts were obtained on different culture media.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed between the two formulations (p > 0.05) regarding the pharmacokinetic parameters. Total microorganisms, staphylococci and streptococci counts did not show statistical differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups during each sampling time. Considering the microorganisms of each group, no statistically significant differences were found after drug administration, but all differed from pre-dose counts (p < 0.05). The observed t > MIC ranged from 14.45 h (+/- 1.69) to 1.19 h (+/- 2.17) considering MICs of 0.25 microg/ml and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively. There was no correlation between any t > MIC, %t > MIC or AUC0-24 and bacterial reduction (between 0- and 12-h periods). However, the profile of reduction of microorganisms in both saliva and nasal samples were compatible with high values of t > MIC verified for both clarithromycin formulations.

CONCLUSION

Both formulations of clarithromycin had similar pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

摘要

目的

采用开放、随机、两周期交叉设计,评估克拉霉素(CLR)在健康志愿者体内的药代动力学及其对口腔和鼻腔微生物群的影响。

方法

单次口服500mg CLR(第1组:默克公司产品;第2组:克拉仙),两次给药间隔1周。给药前至24小时采集血样。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定血浆中CLR浓度。给药前以及给药1.33、2、6和12小时后采集唾液和鼻黏膜拭子。估算药代动力学和PK/PD(t>MIC、%t>MIC和AUC0-24/MIC比值)参数。在不同培养基上进行微生物计数。

结果

两种制剂的药代动力学参数无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。两组在各采样时间的总微生物、葡萄球菌和链球菌计数无统计学差异(p>0.05)。就每组微生物而言,给药后未发现统计学显著差异,但均与给药前计数不同(p<0.05)。分别考虑0.25μg/ml和2.0μg/ml的MIC时,观察到的t>MIC范围为14.45小时(±1.69)至1.19小时(±2.17)。任何t>MIC、%t>MIC或AUC0-24与细菌减少量(0至12小时期间)之间均无相关性。然而,唾液和鼻腔样本中微生物减少的情况与两种克拉霉素制剂验证的高t>MIC值相符。

结论

两种克拉霉素制剂具有相似的药代动力学和疗效。

相似文献

1
A PK/PD approach on the effects of clarithromycin against oral and nasal microbiota of healthy volunteers.一种关于克拉霉素对健康志愿者口腔和鼻腔微生物群影响的药代动力学/药效学方法。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):96-103. doi: 10.5414/cpp47096.
2
Assessment of the bioequivalence of two formulations of clarithromycin extended-release 500-mg tablets under fasting and fed conditions: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover study in healthy Jordanian male volunteers.500毫克克拉霉素缓释片两种制剂在空腹和进食条件下的生物等效性评估:一项在健康约旦男性志愿者中进行的单剂量、随机、开放标签、两周期、双向交叉研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1831-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.010.
3
Comparative bioavailability of clarithromycin formulations in healthy brazilian volunteers.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug;43(8):399-404. doi: 10.5414/cpp43399.
4
Clarithromycin bioequivalence study of two oral formulations in healthy human volunteers.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Jul;38(7):345-54. doi: 10.5414/cpp38345.
5
Plasma and salivary amoxicillin concentrations and effect against oral microorganisms.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct;45(10):556-62. doi: 10.5414/cpp45556.
6
Bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of clarithromycin in human male subjects.克拉霉素两种口服制剂在男性受试者中的生物等效性研究。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2011 Jan;24(1):43-6.
7
Clarithromycin: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interrelationships and dosage regimen.克拉霉素:药代动力学与药效学的相互关系及给药方案
J Chemother. 1999 Feb;11(1):11-27. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.1.11.
8
Clarithromycin suspension: bioequivalence studies on two different strengths.克拉霉素混悬液:两种不同规格的生物等效性研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):594-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297055.
9
Studies on the bioequivalence of different strengths of tablets containing clarithromycin.不同规格克拉霉素片剂的生物等效性研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):588-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297054.
10
Serum bactericidal activity of gemifloxacin versus clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibility to quinolones.吉米沙星与克拉霉素对不同喹诺酮敏感性肺炎链球菌的血清杀菌活性
J Chemother. 2004 Feb;16(1):56-61. doi: 10.1179/joc.2004.16.1.56.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-induced taste and smell alterations: a case/non-case evaluation of an italian database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting.药物引起的味觉和嗅觉改变:意大利自发药物不良反应报告数据库的病例/非病例评估。
Drug Saf. 2011 Oct 1;34(10):849-59. doi: 10.2165/11593120-000000000-00000.