Suppr超能文献

半干旱草原中,入侵树种维吉尼亚杜松和西黄松以及两种优势C4草本植物水分吸收深度的季节性变化。

Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland.

作者信息

Eggemeyer Kathleen D, Awada Tala, Harvey F Edwin, Wedin David A, Zhou Xinhua, Zanner C William

机构信息

School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 406 Hardin Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0974, USA.

出版信息

Tree Physiol. 2009 Feb;29(2):157-69. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn019. Epub 2008 Dec 5.

Abstract

We used the natural abundance of stable isotopic ratios of hydrogen and oxygen in soil (0.05-3 m depth), plant xylem and precipitation to determine the seasonal changes in sources of soil water uptake by two native encroaching woody species (Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson, Juniperus virginiana L.), and two C(4) grasses (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash, Panicum virgatum L.), in the semiarid Sandhills grasslands of Nebraska. Grass species extracted most of their water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m). Soil water uptake from below 0.5 m depth increased under drought, but appeared to be minimal in relation to the total water use of these species. The grasses senesced in late August in response to drought conditions. In contrast to grasses, P. ponderosa and J. virginiana trees exhibited significant plasticity in sources of water uptake. In winter, tree species extracted a large fraction of their soil water from below 0.9 m depth. In spring when shallow soil water was available, tree species used water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m) and relied little on water from below 0.5 m depth. During the growing season (May-August) significant differences between the patterns of tree species water uptake emerged. Pinus ponderosa acquired a large fraction of its water from the 0.05-0.5 and 0.5-0.9 m soil profiles. Compared with P. ponderosa, J. virginiana acquired water from the 0.05-0.5 m profile during the early growing season but the amount extracted from this profile progressively declined between May and August and was mirrored by a progressive increase in the fraction taken up from 0.5-0.9 m depth, showing plasticity in tracking the general increase in soil water content within the 0.5-0.9 m profile, and being less responsive to growing season precipitation events. In September, soil water content declined to its minimum, and both tree species shifted soil water uptake to below 0.9 m. Tree transpiration rates (E) and water potentials (Psi) indicated that deep water sources did not maintain E which sharply declined in September, but played an important role in the recovery of tree Psi. Differences in sources of water uptake among these species and their ecological implications on tree-grass dynamics and soil water in semiarid environments are discussed.

摘要

我们利用土壤(深度0.05 - 3米)、植物木质部和降水中氢和氧稳定同位素比率的自然丰度,来确定内布拉斯加州半干旱沙丘草原上两种原生入侵木本物种(黄松Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson、维吉尼亚杜松Juniperus virginiana L.)以及两种C4草本植物(柳枝稷Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash、野牛草Panicum virgatum L.)吸收土壤水分来源的季节性变化。草本植物大部分水分从土壤上层(0.05 - 0.5米)获取。干旱时,0.5米以下深度的土壤水分吸收量增加,但相对于这些物种的总用水量而言似乎极少。由于干旱条件,草本植物在8月下旬枯萎。与草本植物不同,黄松和维吉尼亚杜松在水分吸收来源方面表现出显著的可塑性。冬季,树木物种从0.9米以下深度吸收大部分土壤水分。春季浅层土壤有水时,树木物种利用土壤上层(0.05 - 0.5米)的水,很少依赖0.5米以下深度的水。在生长季节(5 - 8月),树木物种的水分吸收模式出现显著差异。黄松大部分水分从0.05 - 0.5米和0.5 - 0.9米土壤层获取。与黄松相比,维吉尼亚杜松在生长季节早期从0.05 - 0.5米土层吸收水分,但从该土层吸收的量在5月至8月间逐渐减少,同时从0.5 - 0.9米深度吸收的比例逐渐增加,显示出在追踪0.5 - 0.9米土层土壤含水量总体增加方面的可塑性,并且对生长季节降水事件的响应较小。9月,土壤含水量降至最低,两种树木物种都将土壤水分吸收转移至0.9米以下。树木蒸腾速率(E)和水势(Ψ)表明,深层水源无法维持9月急剧下降的蒸腾速率E,但在树木水势Ψ的恢复中发挥了重要作用。本文讨论了这些物种在水分吸收来源上的差异及其对半干旱环境中树木 - 草本动态和土壤水分的生态影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验