• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半干旱草原中,入侵树种维吉尼亚杜松和西黄松以及两种优势C4草本植物水分吸收深度的季节性变化。

Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland.

作者信息

Eggemeyer Kathleen D, Awada Tala, Harvey F Edwin, Wedin David A, Zhou Xinhua, Zanner C William

机构信息

School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 406 Hardin Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0974, USA.

出版信息

Tree Physiol. 2009 Feb;29(2):157-69. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn019. Epub 2008 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpn019
PMID:19203941
Abstract

We used the natural abundance of stable isotopic ratios of hydrogen and oxygen in soil (0.05-3 m depth), plant xylem and precipitation to determine the seasonal changes in sources of soil water uptake by two native encroaching woody species (Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson, Juniperus virginiana L.), and two C(4) grasses (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash, Panicum virgatum L.), in the semiarid Sandhills grasslands of Nebraska. Grass species extracted most of their water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m). Soil water uptake from below 0.5 m depth increased under drought, but appeared to be minimal in relation to the total water use of these species. The grasses senesced in late August in response to drought conditions. In contrast to grasses, P. ponderosa and J. virginiana trees exhibited significant plasticity in sources of water uptake. In winter, tree species extracted a large fraction of their soil water from below 0.9 m depth. In spring when shallow soil water was available, tree species used water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m) and relied little on water from below 0.5 m depth. During the growing season (May-August) significant differences between the patterns of tree species water uptake emerged. Pinus ponderosa acquired a large fraction of its water from the 0.05-0.5 and 0.5-0.9 m soil profiles. Compared with P. ponderosa, J. virginiana acquired water from the 0.05-0.5 m profile during the early growing season but the amount extracted from this profile progressively declined between May and August and was mirrored by a progressive increase in the fraction taken up from 0.5-0.9 m depth, showing plasticity in tracking the general increase in soil water content within the 0.5-0.9 m profile, and being less responsive to growing season precipitation events. In September, soil water content declined to its minimum, and both tree species shifted soil water uptake to below 0.9 m. Tree transpiration rates (E) and water potentials (Psi) indicated that deep water sources did not maintain E which sharply declined in September, but played an important role in the recovery of tree Psi. Differences in sources of water uptake among these species and their ecological implications on tree-grass dynamics and soil water in semiarid environments are discussed.

摘要

我们利用土壤(深度0.05 - 3米)、植物木质部和降水中氢和氧稳定同位素比率的自然丰度,来确定内布拉斯加州半干旱沙丘草原上两种原生入侵木本物种(黄松Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson、维吉尼亚杜松Juniperus virginiana L.)以及两种C4草本植物(柳枝稷Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash、野牛草Panicum virgatum L.)吸收土壤水分来源的季节性变化。草本植物大部分水分从土壤上层(0.05 - 0.5米)获取。干旱时,0.5米以下深度的土壤水分吸收量增加,但相对于这些物种的总用水量而言似乎极少。由于干旱条件,草本植物在8月下旬枯萎。与草本植物不同,黄松和维吉尼亚杜松在水分吸收来源方面表现出显著的可塑性。冬季,树木物种从0.9米以下深度吸收大部分土壤水分。春季浅层土壤有水时,树木物种利用土壤上层(0.05 - 0.5米)的水,很少依赖0.5米以下深度的水。在生长季节(5 - 8月),树木物种的水分吸收模式出现显著差异。黄松大部分水分从0.05 - 0.5米和0.5 - 0.9米土壤层获取。与黄松相比,维吉尼亚杜松在生长季节早期从0.05 - 0.5米土层吸收水分,但从该土层吸收的量在5月至8月间逐渐减少,同时从0.5 - 0.9米深度吸收的比例逐渐增加,显示出在追踪0.5 - 0.9米土层土壤含水量总体增加方面的可塑性,并且对生长季节降水事件的响应较小。9月,土壤含水量降至最低,两种树木物种都将土壤水分吸收转移至0.9米以下。树木蒸腾速率(E)和水势(Ψ)表明,深层水源无法维持9月急剧下降的蒸腾速率E,但在树木水势Ψ的恢复中发挥了重要作用。本文讨论了这些物种在水分吸收来源上的差异及其对半干旱环境中树木 - 草本动态和土壤水分的生态影响。

相似文献

1
Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland.半干旱草原中,入侵树种维吉尼亚杜松和西黄松以及两种优势C4草本植物水分吸收深度的季节性变化。
Tree Physiol. 2009 Feb;29(2):157-69. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn019. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
2
Photosynthetic performance of invasive Pinus ponderosa and Juniperus virginiana seedlings under gradual soil water depletion.在土壤水分逐渐亏缺下,入侵的火炬松和南方刺柏实生苗的光合性能。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Jul 1;12(4):668-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00251.x.
3
Stable isotopes in ecosystem science: structure, function and dynamics of a subtropical Savanna.生态系统科学中的稳定同位素:亚热带稀树草原的结构、功能与动态
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999;13(13):1263-77. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990715)13:13<1263::AID-RCM653>3.0.CO;2-J.
4
The partitioning of water uptake between growth forms in a Neotropical savanna: do herbs exploit a third water source niche?在新热带草原中,不同生长型对水分的获取存在分区:草本植物是否开拓了第三个水分获取小生境?
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15(1):84-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00618.x. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
5
Water sources of dominant species in three alpine ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau, China.中国青藏高原三个高山生态系统中优势物种的水源
J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Mar;50(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00633.x.
6
Water relations and photosynthetic performance in Larix sibirica growing in the forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia.蒙古北部森林草原交错带西伯利亚落叶松的水分关系与光合性能
Tree Physiol. 2009 Jan;29(1):99-110. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn008. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
7
Climate warming and precipitation redistribution modify tree-grass interactions and tree species establishment in a warm-temperate savanna.气候变暖与降水再分配改变了暖温带草原的林-草相互作用和树种定居。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Mar;19(3):843-57. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12068. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Water availability and genetic effects on water relations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands.水分可利用性和遗传效应对火炬松(Pinus taeda)林水分关系的影响。
Tree Physiol. 2010 Mar;30(3):376-92. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp118. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Species-specific patterns of hydraulic lift in co-occurring adult trees and grasses in a sandhill community.沙丘群落中共存成年树木和草本植物的物种特异性水力提升模式。
Oecologia. 2004 Feb;138(3):341-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1460-8. Epub 2003 Dec 19.
10
Paired comparison of water, energy and carbon exchanges over two young maritime pine stands (Pinus pinaster Ait.): effects of thinning and weeding in the early stage of tree growth.两株年轻的海松(Pinus pinaster Ait.)林分水分、能量和碳交换的成对比较:在树木生长的早期阶段疏伐和除草的影响。
Tree Physiol. 2011 Sep;31(9):903-21. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr048. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Topography-driven microclimate gradients shape forest structure, diversity, and composition in a temperate refugial forest.地形驱动的小气候梯度塑造了温带避难所森林的结构、多样性和组成。
Plant Environ Interact. 2024 Jun 11;5(3):e10153. doi: 10.1002/pei3.10153. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Differential eco-physiological performance to declining groundwater depth in Central Asian C and C shrubs in the Gurbantunggut Desert.古尔班通古特沙漠中亚C3和C4灌木对地下水位下降的生态生理差异表现
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 18;14:1244555. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1244555. eCollection 2023.
3
Patterns of deep fine root and water utilization amongst trees, shrubs and herbs in subtropical pine plantations with seasonal droughts.
亚热带季节性干旱松人工林中树木、灌木和草本植物的深细根模式及水分利用情况
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Sep 20;14:1275464. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1275464. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of post oak (Quercus stellata) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis) competition on water uptake and root partitioning of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana).栎树和雀麦竞争对湿地松(Juniperus virginiana)吸水和根系分配的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 1;18(2):e0280100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280100. eCollection 2023.
5
Different Responses in Root Water Uptake of Summer Maize to Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilization.夏玉米根系水分吸收对种植密度和氮肥施用的不同响应
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 24;13:918043. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.918043. eCollection 2022.
6
Halophytes Differ in Their Adaptation to Soil Environment in the Yellow River Delta: Effects of Water Source, Soil Depth, and Nutrient Stoichiometry.黄河三角洲盐生植物对土壤环境的适应存在差异:水源、土壤深度和养分化学计量比的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 1;12:675921. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.675921. eCollection 2021.
7
Shade is the most important factor limiting growth of a woody range expander.遮荫是限制木本扩展物种生长的最重要因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 2;15(12):e0242003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242003. eCollection 2020.
8
Root Architecture and Functional Traits of Spring Wheat Under Contrasting Water Regimes.不同水分条件下春小麦的根系结构与功能特性
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 11;11:581140. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.581140. eCollection 2020.
9
Hydraulic traits of co-existing conifers do not correlate with local hydroclimate condition: a case study in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A.共生针叶树的水力特性与当地水气候条件不相关:来自美国落基山脉北部的案例研究
Oecologia. 2021 Dec;197(4):1049-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04772-z. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Evapotranspiration and water source of a tropical rainforest in peninsular Malaysia.马来西亚半岛热带雨林的蒸散作用与水源
Hydrol Process. 2017 Nov 30;31(24):4338-4353. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11360. Epub 2017 Oct 19.