Suppr超能文献

药物基因组学、证据及支付方的作用。

Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers.

作者信息

Deverka P A

机构信息

Division of Pharmacotherapy, UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7360, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.1159/000189627. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

Abstract

Initial enthusiasm for the potential of pharmacogenomics (PGx) to transform medical practice has been tempered by the reality that the process of biomarker discovery, validation, and clinical qualification has been disappointingly slow, with a limited number of PGx tests entering the marketplace since the initial publication of the human genome sequence. Reasons for the delays include the complexity of the underlying science as well as clinical, economic, and organizational barriers to the effective delivery of personalized health care. Nevertheless, payers are interested in using PGx services to ensure that drug use is safer and more effective, particularly in the settings of medications that are widely used, have significant risks of serious adverse events, have poor or highly variable drug response, or are very expensive. However, public and private payers have specific evidence requirements for new health care technologies that must be met prior to obtaining favorable coverage and reimbursement status. These evaluation criteria are frequently more rigorous than the current level of evidence required for regulatory approval of new PGx tests or PGx-related drug labeling. To support payer decision-making, researchers will need to measure the impact of PGx testing on clinical and economic outcomes and demonstrate the net benefit of PGx testing as compared to usual care. By linking payer information needs with the current PGx research agenda, there is the opportunity to develop the data required for informed decision-making. This strategy will increase the likelihood that PGx services will be both reimbursed and used appropriately in clinical practice.

摘要

药物基因组学(PGx)改变医疗实践的潜力最初引发了人们的热情,但生物标志物发现、验证和临床鉴定过程令人失望地缓慢,自人类基因组序列首次公布以来,进入市场的PGx检测数量有限,这一现实使这种热情有所降温。延迟的原因包括基础科学的复杂性以及有效提供个性化医疗保健的临床、经济和组织障碍。尽管如此,支付方有兴趣使用PGx服务,以确保药物使用更安全、更有效,特别是在广泛使用、有严重不良事件重大风险、药物反应不佳或高度可变或非常昂贵的药物使用场景中。然而,公共和私人支付方对新的医疗保健技术有特定的证据要求,在获得有利的保险覆盖和报销状态之前必须满足这些要求。这些评估标准通常比新PGx检测或与PGx相关的药物标签监管批准所需的当前证据水平更为严格。为了支持支付方的决策,研究人员需要衡量PGx检测对临床和经济结果的影响,并证明与常规治疗相比PGx检测的净效益。通过将支付方的信息需求与当前的PGx研究议程联系起来,有机会开发出明智决策所需的数据。这种策略将增加PGx服务在临床实践中得到报销和合理使用的可能性。

相似文献

1
Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers.
Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.1159/000189627. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
2
Reimbursement of pharmacogenetic tests at a tertiary academic medical center in the United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1179364. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1179364. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics for Personalized Precision Medicine: Barriers and Solutions.
J Pharm Sci. 2017 Sep;106(9):2368-2379. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.051. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Pharmacogenomics in practice: a review and implementation guide.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 18;14:1189976. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1189976. eCollection 2023.
6
PARC report: health outcomes and value of personalized medicine interventions: impact on patient care.
Pharmacogenomics. 2020 Jul;21(11):797-807. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0194. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
Payer Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Health Care Decision Making: Oncology Examples.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):125-134. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.125.
8
Implementation of Pharmacogenomics in Everyday Clinical Settings.
Adv Pharmacol. 2018;83:219-246. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2018.04.003.
9
Payer view of personalized medicine.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):2007-2012. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160038.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management.
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jul 12;18:11786329251356560. doi: 10.1177/11786329251356560. eCollection 2025.
2
Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):501-524. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: exploring the knowledge and perspectives of US payers.
Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1224-1232. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.181. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Challenges and Solutions for Future Pharmacy Practice in the Era of Precision Medicine.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6652. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6652.
7
Economic evaluation of personalized medicine: a call for real-world data.
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;18(9):1065-1067. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0890-x.
9
Payer Coverage for Hereditary Cancer Panels: Barriers, Opportunities, and Implications for the Precision Medicine Initiative.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Feb;15(2):219-228. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0022. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Insurance coverage for pharmacogenomic testing in the USA.
Per Med. 2007 Nov;4(4):479-487. doi: 10.2217/17410541.4.4.479.
4
Public health. A case study of personalized medicine.
Science. 2008 Apr 4;320(5872):53-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1156604.
5
Pharmacogenomics--ready for prime time?
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1061-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0800801.
6
Genomic landscapes of cancers: prospects for targeted therapies.
Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Dec;8(12):1629-33. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.12.1629.
7
Serious adverse drug events reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998-2005.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 10;167(16):1752-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1752.
9
Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic.
PLoS Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):e209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040209.
10
Integrating molecular medicine into the US health-care system: opportunities, barriers, and policy challenges.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct;82(4):427-34. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100319. Epub 2007 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验