Bin Zhao, Jingzhen He, Daocai Wang, Kai Liu, Cheng Liu
Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Jinan, China.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):951-4. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31815ba1cd.
To retrospectively determine, by using multislice computed tomography (MSCT), whether additional interpretation of sliding-thin-slab maximum-intensity projection (MIP) reformation images improve diagnostic accuracy when compared with the diagnostic interpretation of conventional sliding-thin-slab multiplanar reformation (MPR) CT images for traumatic ossicular chain separation.
Twenty-nine patients with pathologically or clinically confirmed unilateral traumatic ossicular chain separation who underwent temporal bone MSCT were retrospectively identified from electronic medical records. An additional 29 control subjects, who underwent temporal bone MSCT for other reasons, were retrospectively selected from the same period. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed the 116 temporal bones twice. One review was restricted to MPR ("MPR only") images. The other review used MIP images and MPR ("all reformations") images. The observers were blinded to clinical history, and the 2 reviews took place 8 weeks apart to avoid recall bias. The chi2 test was performed for diagnostic accuracy between MPR images and all reformation images. Cohen kappa statistics was used to evaluate interobserver variability.
With "all reformations" images, observer 1 diagnosed traumatic ossicular chain separation in 28 (24.1%) of 116 temporal bones, which is significantly higher than that with MPR (16.4%, 19/116 temporal bones, P < 0.05); Observer 2 diagnosed traumatic ossicular chain separation in 27 (23.3%) of 116 temporal bones, which is also significantly higher than that with MPR (17.2.0%, 20/116 bones, P < 0.05). The kappa values were 0.89 and 0.96, respectively, on the basis of MPR and "all reformations" images that revealed high interobserver agreement, independent of the imaging modality (MPR or "all reformations" images).
Additional interpreting MIP images provided more accurate diagnoses than interpreting MPR images alone for diagnosis of traumatic ossicular chain separation.
采用多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT),回顾性确定对于外伤性听骨链分离,与传统的薄层多平面重组(MPR)CT图像的诊断解读相比,滑动薄层最大密度投影(MIP)重组图像的额外解读是否能提高诊断准确性。
从电子病历中回顾性选取29例经病理或临床证实为单侧外伤性听骨链分离且接受了颞骨MSCT检查的患者。另外从同一时期回顾性选取29例因其他原因接受颞骨MSCT检查的对照受试者。两名神经放射科医生对116例颞骨进行了两次独立阅片。一次阅片仅限于MPR(“仅MPR”)图像。另一次阅片使用MIP图像和MPR(“所有重组图像”)。观察者对临床病史不知情,且两次阅片间隔8周以避免回忆偏倚。对MPR图像和所有重组图像之间的诊断准确性进行卡方检验。采用Cohen kappa统计量评估观察者间的变异性。
对于“所有重组图像”,观察者1在116例颞骨中的28例(24.1%)中诊断出外伤性听骨链分离,这显著高于MPR图像(16.4%,19/116例颞骨,P<0.05);观察者2在116例颞骨中的27例(23.3%)中诊断出外伤性听骨链分离,这也显著高于MPR图像(17.2%,20/116例颞骨,P<0.05)。基于MPR和“所有重组图像”的kappa值分别为0.89和0.96,显示出观察者间高度一致,与成像方式(MPR或“所有重组图像”)无关。
对于外伤性听骨链分离的诊断,额外解读MIP图像比单独解读MPR图像能提供更准确的诊断。