O'Keeffe Terence, Shafi Shahid, Sperry Jason L, Gentilello Larry M
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):495-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818234bf.
Alcohol intoxication may confound the initial assessment of trauma patients, resulting in increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, thereby increasing hospital costs. The Uniform Policy Provision Law (UPPL) exists in many states and allows insurance companies to deny payment for medical treatment for alcohol-related injuries. If intoxication increases resource utilization, these denials compound the financial burden of alcohol use on trauma centers. We hypothesized that patients injured while under the influence of alcohol require more diagnostic tests, procedures, and hospital admissions, leading to higher hospital charges.
The National Trauma Databank (2000-2004) was analyzed to identify adult trauma patients (age > or = 16 years) who were discharged alive, had a length of stay < or = 1 day and minor injuries (Injury Severity Score < 9), and were tested for blood alcohol. The study was confined to minimally injured patients to facilitate identification of unexpected resource use most likely attributable to alcohol use. Resource utilization was compared among patients who tested positive or negative for alcohol use. Results are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Sixty-eight thousand eight patients met study criteria, of which 31,020 were positive for alcohol. Despite similar baseline characteristics, alcohol-positive patients required significantly more invasive procedures, including intubation (OR 4.16, 95% CI = 3.56-4.85) and Foley catheter insertion (OR 1.52, 95% CI = 1.39-1.67) as well as diagnostic tests (CT scan OR 1.16, 95% CI = 1.12-1.20). They were also less likely to be discharged from the emergency department (OR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.58-0.64), and more frequently required hospital (OR 1.64, 95% CI = 1.57-1.73) or intensive care unit admission (OR 1.82, 95% CI = 1.71-1.94). Mean hospital charges were $1,833 greater ($10,405 +/- 225 vs. 8,572 +/- 68).
A significant amount of trauma center costs are primarily attributable to alcohol use rather than injury severity or outcome. The financial costs associated with alcohol use and UPPL-related cost-shifting to trauma centers is a significant burden to trauma centers. UPPL laws that penalize trauma centers for identifying intoxicated patients should be repealed in states where they exist.
酒精中毒可能会混淆创伤患者的初始评估,导致诊断和治疗程序的使用增加,从而增加医院成本。许多州都存在统一政策条款法(UPPL),该法允许保险公司拒绝支付与酒精相关损伤的医疗费用。如果中毒增加了资源利用,这些拒付会加重创伤中心酒精使用的经济负担。我们假设在酒精影响下受伤的患者需要更多的诊断测试、程序和住院治疗,从而导致更高的医院费用。
分析国家创伤数据库(2000 - 2004年),以确定成年创伤患者(年龄≥16岁),这些患者存活出院,住院时间≤1天且为轻伤(损伤严重度评分<9),并进行了血液酒精检测。该研究仅限于轻伤患者,以便于识别最可能归因于酒精使用的意外资源利用情况。比较酒精检测呈阳性或阴性的患者的资源利用情况。结果以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。
68808名患者符合研究标准,其中31020名酒精检测呈阳性。尽管基线特征相似,但酒精阳性患者需要更多的侵入性操作,包括插管(OR 4.16,95%CI = 3.56 - 4.85)和插入弗利导尿管(OR 1.52,95%CI = 1.39 - 1.67)以及诊断测试(CT扫描OR 1.16,95%CI = 1.12 - 1.20)。他们从急诊科出院的可能性也较小(OR 0.61,95%CI = 0.58 - 0.64),更频繁地需要住院(OR 1.64,95%CI = 1.57 - 1.73)或入住重症监护病房(OR 1.82,95%CI = 1.71 - 1.94)。平均医院费用高出1833美元(10405±225美元对8572±68美元)。
创伤中心的大量成本主要归因于酒精使用,而非损伤严重程度或结果。与酒精使用相关的财务成本以及UPPL相关的成本转移给创伤中心是创伤中心的一项重大负担。在存在惩罚创伤中心识别中毒患者的UPPL法律的州,应予以废除。