Suppr超能文献

国家创伤数据库对创伤结局研究的影响:是否到了制定研究最佳实践以进一步增强其影响力的时候了?

Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact?

机构信息

Center for Surgery Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21212, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):756-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk-adjusted analyses are critical in evaluating trauma outcomes. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) is a statistically robust registry that allows such analyses; however, analytical techniques are not yet standardized. In this study, we examined peer-reviewed manuscripts published using NTDB data, with particular attention to characteristics strongly associated with trauma outcomes. Our objective was to determine if there are substantial variations in the methodology and quality of risk-adjusted analyses and therefore, whether development of best practices for risk-adjusted analyses is warranted.

STUDY DESIGN

A database of all studies using NTDB data published through December 2010 was created by searching PubMed and Embase. Studies with multivariate risk-adjusted analyses were examined for their central question, main outcomes measures, analytical techniques, covariates in adjusted analyses, and handling of missing data.

RESULTS

Of 286 NTDB publications, 122 performed a multivariable adjusted analysis. These studies focused on clinical outcomes (51 studies), public health policy or injury prevention (30), quality (16), disparities (15), trauma center designation (6), or scoring systems (4). Mortality was the main outcome in 98 of these studies. There were considerable differences in the covariates used for case adjustment. The 3 covariates most frequently controlled for were age (95%), Injury Severity Score (85%), and sex (78%). Up to 43% of studies did not control for the 5 basic covariates necessary to conduct a risk-adjusted analysis of trauma mortality. Less than 10% of studies used clustering to adjust for facility differences or imputation to handle missing data.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in how risk-adjusted analyses using data from the NTDB are performed. Best practices are needed to further improve the quality of research from the NTDB.

摘要

背景

风险调整分析在评估创伤结局中至关重要。国家创伤数据库(NTDB)是一个具有统计学稳健性的登记处,允许进行此类分析;然而,分析技术尚未标准化。在这项研究中,我们检查了使用 NTDB 数据发表的同行评议文献,特别关注与创伤结局密切相关的特征。我们的目的是确定使用 NTDB 数据进行风险调整分析的方法和质量是否存在显著差异,因此是否需要制定风险调整分析的最佳实践。

研究设计

通过搜索 PubMed 和 Embase 创建了一个包含所有使用 NTDB 数据发表的研究的数据库,这些研究发表于 2010 年 12 月之前。检查了具有多变量风险调整分析的研究的中心问题、主要结局测量、分析技术、调整分析中的协变量以及缺失数据的处理。

结果

在 286 篇 NTDB 出版物中,有 122 篇进行了多变量调整分析。这些研究的重点是临床结局(51 篇)、公共卫生政策或伤害预防(30 篇)、质量(16 篇)、差异(15 篇)、创伤中心指定(6 篇)或评分系统(4 篇)。这些研究中有 98 篇的主要结局是死亡率。用于病例调整的协变量差异很大。最常控制的 3 个协变量是年龄(95%)、损伤严重程度评分(85%)和性别(78%)。多达 43%的研究未控制创伤死亡率风险调整分析所需的 5 个基本协变量。不到 10%的研究使用聚类来调整医疗机构差异,或使用插补来处理缺失数据。

结论

使用 NTDB 数据进行风险调整分析的方法存在显著差异。需要制定最佳实践,以进一步提高 NTDB 研究的质量。

相似文献

4
Reliability adjustment: a necessity for trauma center ranking and benchmarking.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):166-72. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318298494f.
5
Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):439-48; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.002.
6
Predicting hospital mortality among injured children using a national trauma database.
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):792-801. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000214589.02515.dd.
7
Benchmarking trauma centers on mortality alone does not reflect quality of care: implications for pay-for-performance.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 May;76(5):1184-91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000215.
9
Breadth of use of The Abbreviated Injury Scale in The National Trauma Data Bank bank.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S219-S222. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2125233. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Deaths and high-risk trauma patients missed by standard trauma data sources.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Sep;83(3):427-437. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001616.

引用本文的文献

1
2
A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries.
OTA Int. 2025 Aug 12;8(4 Suppl):e390. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000390. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Concurrence of Intracranial Injuries with Facial Trauma: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Feb 6;33(3):427-434. doi: 10.1177/22925503231217514. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Trauma by the Numbers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis and Categorization of Trauma Cases in the Gaza War.
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 22;70:1607877. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607877. eCollection 2025.
5
Understanding disparities in firearm mortality: The role of person- and place-based factors.
Injury. 2025 May;56(5):112275. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112275. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
6
Understanding hospital length of stay in trauma laparotomy patients: a National Trauma Database Study.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Feb 4;10(1):e001641. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641. eCollection 2025.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Helicopter Transport After Severe Trauma in the US.
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):313-321. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6402.
8
Predictors of sepsis in trauma patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 20;11:1500201. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1500201. eCollection 2024.
9
Comprehensive epidemiological assessment of trauma incidents at a level I trauma center.
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Dec 16;12(35):6808-6814. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i35.6808.
10
Analyzing Epidemiology and Hospital Course Outcomes of LeFort Fractures in the Largest National Pediatric Trauma Database.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP154-NP162. doi: 10.1177/19433875241262616. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Redefining hypotension in the elderly: normotension is not reassuring.
Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):865-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.154.
3
Should trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 be intubated prior to hospital arrival?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):541-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008736.
4
Health care reform at trauma centers--mortality, complications, and length of stay.
J Trauma. 2010 Dec;69(6):1367-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181fb785d.
6
National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary.
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Oct 26(29):1-20, 24.
8
Multiple imputation in trauma disparity research.
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):e37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
9
Race/ethnicity and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a National Trauma Data Bank study.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Oct;102(10):865-9. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30700-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验