Bach Peter, Wormland Renate T, Möhring Cornelia, Goepel Mark
Department of Urology, Klinikum Niederberg Velbert, Academic Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Velbert, Germany.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):209-13. doi: 10.1002/nau.20624.
Electromotive drug-administration (EMDA) represents a minimal-invasive method of intravesical instillation of therapeutic agents. We examined the therapeutic effect of EMDA in patients suffering from therapy-resistant idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) with respect to urodynamics, micturition charts and quality of life (Kings Health Questionnaire).
Patients suffering from urge syndrome with and without urge incontinence and non-responding to oral anticholinergic drugs underwent EMDA therapy (2000 mg lidocaine-HCl 4% (50 ml), 2 mg epinephrine [1:1000] (2 ml), 40 mg dexamethason-21-dihydrogen phosphat (10 ml) in a total volume of 100 ml). Over a 27 months period, 84 patients (median age 63.1 years; 72 female, 12 male) with urge syndrome and urodynamically-proven idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) were treated with EMDA. Following urodynamic measurements, quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and a micturition chart over 48 h, EMDA was performed once in four weeks for a period of three months. Patients continued to document drinking and micturition data during this time. Before each EMDA session urodynamic examination and KHQ were repeated.
All treated patients suffered from urge syndrome (25.6% OAB wet, 20.0% OAB dry and 54.4% mixed urinary incontinence). Mean daytime frequency (DF) was 14.1 +/- 7.7 per day and nocturia (N) 5.1 +/- 5.1 per night before EMDA. After two EMDA sessions, daytime frequency (DF) decreased to 9.4 +/- 6.2 per day (P < 0.0001) and 2.5 +/- 2.4 per night (P = 0.035). The use of pads could be lowered from 4.5 +/- 4.1 per 24 h to 1.8 +/- 2.4 (P < 0.0074). The first desire to void volume (FDV) assessed by urodynamics started at 94.0 +/- 60.5 ml before treatment and changed to 142.2 +/- 79.6 ml (P = 0.0064) after two sessions. Strong desire to void volume (SDV) was noticed at 155.6 +/- 84.8 ml filling of the bladder; after two EMDA sessions at 199.5 +/- 97.3 ml (P = 0.001). Uninhibited detrusor contractions (UIC) were seen in all patients before treatment and were reduced to 46.4% after two EMDA sessions (P < 0.001). Maximal cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) increased from 192.3 +/- 106.6 ml to 239.6 +/- 114.9 ml (P = 0.018). Patient-documented bladder capacity (BC) as micturition volume increased from 186.0 +/- 108.7 ml to 234.2 +/- 134.2 ml (P = 0.043). A reduction of impact of Quality of Life (QoL) was observed from 11.8 +/- 0.4 to 7.0 +/- 0.3 (P < 0.001) during treatment. A fraction of 53.6% (45/84) of all patients reported a completely withdrawal of symptoms and 28.6% (24/84) indicated a remarkable reduction. Only 10.7% (9/84) of patients did not continue therapy after two sessions.
EMDA significantly improves urodynamic parameters, QoL and pad usages in patients with urge syndrome and therapy-resistant IDO. Therefore we offer EMDA therapy as an alternative treatment modality to the standard approaches.
电动药物给药(EMDA)是一种膀胱内灌注治疗药物的微创方法。我们研究了EMDA对难治性特发性逼尿肌过度活动(IDO)患者在尿动力学、排尿图表和生活质量(国王健康问卷)方面的治疗效果。
患有尿急综合征(有或无急迫性尿失禁)且对口服抗胆碱能药物无反应的患者接受EMDA治疗(4%盐酸利多卡因2000mg(50ml)、肾上腺素2mg[1:1000](2ml)、地塞米松磷酸二氢钠40mg(10ml),总体积100ml)。在27个月期间,84例患有尿急综合征且经尿动力学证实为特发性逼尿肌过度活动(IDO)的患者(中位年龄63.1岁;女性72例,男性12例)接受了EMDA治疗。在进行尿动力学测量后,使用国王健康问卷(KHQ)和48小时排尿图表评估生活质量(QoL),每四周进行一次EMDA,为期三个月。在此期间,患者继续记录饮水和排尿数据。每次EMDA治疗前重复进行尿动力学检查和KHQ评估。
所有接受治疗的患者均患有尿急综合征(25.6%为OAB湿型,20.0%为OAB干型,54.4%为混合性尿失禁)。EMDA治疗前,平均白天排尿频率(DF)为每天14.1±7.7次,夜间尿频(N)为每晚5.1±5.1次。两次EMDA治疗后,白天排尿频率(DF)降至每天9.4±6.2次(P<0.0001),夜间降至2.5±2.4次(P=0.035)。每24小时使用尿垫的次数可从4.5±4.1次降至1.8±2.4次(P<0.0074)。尿动力学评估的首次排尿欲望容量(FDV)在治疗前为94.0±60.5ml,两次治疗后变为142.2±79.6ml(P=0.0064)。膀胱充盈至155.6±84.8ml时出现强烈排尿欲望容量(SDV);两次EMDA治疗后为199.5±97.3ml(P=0.001)。所有患者治疗前均可见无抑制性逼尿肌收缩(UIC),两次EMDA治疗后降至46.4%(P<0.001)。最大膀胱测压容量(MCBC)从192.3±106.6ml增加到239.6±114.9ml(P=0.018)。患者记录的膀胱容量(BC)即排尿量从186.0±108.7ml增加到234.2±134.2ml(P=0.043)。治疗期间观察到生活质量(QoL)的影响从11.8±0.4降至7.0±0.3(P<0.001)。所有患者中有53.6%(45/84)报告症状完全消失,28.6%(24/84)表示症状明显减轻。只有10.7%(9/84)的患者在两次治疗后未继续治疗。
EMDA可显著改善尿急综合征和难治性IDO患者的尿动力学参数、生活质量和尿垫使用情况。因此,我们提供EMDA治疗作为标准方法的替代治疗方式。