Margotta Vito
Dipartimento di Biologia animale e dell'Uomo, Sede di Anatomia comparata, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy.
Ital J Anat Embryol. 2008 Jul-Sep;113(3):167-86.
Adult Urodele Amphibians, if deprived of the tail, are able to fully regenerate it. This occurs owing to a typical epimorphic phenomenon which takes place in various phases. Within this matter, in particular on the reconstruction of the caudal nervous component, literature sources refer to a great quantity of research following only one amputation of the tail. Being aware of these data we programmed to investigate the possible persistence, decrease or disappearance of the medullary regenerative power after repeated amputations of the regenerated tail. With this objective in view, we have performed on adult Triturus carnifex a series of such operations at time spaced out from one another. In previous experiments, the amputations of the tail have been before seven and then nine. In the current experiment, the same specimens have been subjected to further removals of the tail. This study has developed into three cycles going on over a period of more than ten years. Overall, our panorama rising from the integration of present results and those of former observations is in agreement with what occurs in the area which is the centre of the beginnings of medullary regeneration processes and the bibliographic information concerning the pre-blastematic and blastematic phases. In the subsequent morphogenetic and differentiative phases, however, with the recurrence of the re-establishment of the spinal cord, these events proceed more slowly (gap which reduces when the time interval starting from the operation increases) than in the spinal cords which regenerated after only one tail amputation. Furthermore, although the regenerated spinal cords, if compared to normal spinal cord, show some anomalies (regarding medullary length and diameter, distribution of the spinal nerves and ganglia), the regenerated spinal cords (as well-known uncapable to re-form the Mauthner fibres and supplied with the Rohon-Beard sensitive neurons), their nerves and ganglia reacquire the same complex structural organization as normal spinal cord (where, already known, the Rohon-Beard larval neurons lack, because they play the same role of the spinal ganglia in adult life and disappear when these ganglia first appear). Therefore, at least within numerical bounds of our tail amputations, the medullary regenerative potentialities would seem not to decrease. At the time of our starting investigations, being aware that the Authors ask questions to the morphogenesis of the regenerated spinal cord on which some aspects have not certainly been clarified, two antithetic hypotheses have been proposed. We raised the doubt that the entity of mitotic activity could alone be responsible for the quick reacquisition of a regenerated spinal cord which is superimposable to a normal one. Owing to meditation, we tended towards the hypothesis that this regeneration would be due to trans-differentiative process, which would trigger off in the tissues of the stump of the tail, induced by the impulse following the amputation. In order to obtain a complete picture of the proliferative possibilities responsible mainly, if not exclusively, for these phenomena which could support such our propension, we also programmed the current experiments on a parallel twofold approach. Therefore, we, as in past studies, have analyzed the proliferative activities in progress, through karyokineses and moreover we have attempted to unmask the possible presence of latent proliferative activities symbolized by the elements in the S phase of their vital cycle. To this end, an appropriate proliferative test has been chosen, the Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA). Mitoses and signals of perspective proliferative activities, revealed by this immunocytochemical marker, are localizable in the ependyma and the periventricular grey. In the normal spinal cord there is an irrelevant karyokinetic activity coexisting with the expression of a PCNA considerably higher. Against these physiological proliferative paintings, in progress and potential, in the regenerating and regenerated spinal cords the numerical entity of the mitoses and of the cells revealing DNA synthesis has been found to be, if not negligible, modest or on the whole inadequate to sustain the regeneration events in progress and later possible ones after further amputations of the tail. Based on the evidence at present available, one could hypothesize that the impulse following the amputation of the normal tail would operate as a priority on the natural incomparable initial reserve of cyclic cells in the S phase, detected immunoreactively, which would be depositary of medullary proliferative silent potentialities, so that these cells, leaving the stand by condition in which they would be, would mobilize and passing through the M phase would set out for their differentiation. These undifferentiated cells would be, therefore, mainly responsible for the first medullary regenerative event. Such a scenario would give weight to those Authors that suggested these elements play a decisive role in the regenerative processes, Authors, that's so, have limited their observations to only one amputation of the tail. After this event, once the inizial considerable stock of undifferentiated cells has irreparably dropped, one could then suppose that the shock subsequent to each new amputation promotes in the stump of the amputated tail trans-differentiative processes which would become of primary weight for the following new medullary regenerations. This interpretation, therefore, prefigures that the shock would have a different primary target depending on whether it is connected to the first or to successive amputations of the tail. In the dispute regarding the genesis of the regenerated spinal cord in adult Urodele Amphibians, such a vision taking into consideration current data would make it possible, to a certain extent, to reconcile the two contrasting hypotheses previously advanced by Authors and put an end to the doubts expressed by us in the past at the time of previous our observations where in supporting the hypothesis regarding trans-differentiative activities, we have been hesitant in sustaining they were solely responsible for these events.
成年有尾两栖动物若尾巴被切除,能够使其完全再生。这是由于一种典型的再生现象,该现象发生在多个阶段。在此方面,特别是关于尾神经成分的重建,文献资料中提及的大量研究仅针对尾巴单次截肢后的情况。鉴于这些数据,我们计划研究在再生尾巴多次截肢后,脊髓再生能力是否可能持续、减弱或消失。出于这一目的,我们对成年意大利真螈进行了一系列此类手术,手术时间间隔彼此不同。在之前的实验中,尾巴截肢次数先是七次,然后是九次。在当前实验中,对相同的标本进行了进一步的尾巴切除。这项研究历经三个周期,持续了十余年。总体而言,综合当前结果与先前观察结果呈现出的情况与在脊髓再生过程起始中心区域所发生的情况以及关于前胚基和胚基阶段的文献信息相符。然而,在随后的形态发生和分化阶段,随着脊髓重建的再次发生,这些事件的进展比仅在尾巴单次截肢后再生的脊髓更为缓慢(从手术开始计算的时间间隔增加时,这种差距会缩小)。此外,尽管再生脊髓与正常脊髓相比存在一些异常(在脊髓长度和直径、脊神经和神经节的分布方面),再生脊髓(如众所周知的无法重新形成莫纳氏纤维且配备了罗霍恩 - 比尔兹敏感神经元),但其神经和神经节重新获得了与正常脊髓相同的复杂结构组织(在正常脊髓中,已知罗霍恩 - 比尔兹幼虫神经元不存在,因为它们在成年期发挥着与脊髓神经节相同的作用,并且在这些神经节首次出现时就会消失)。因此,至少在我们进行尾巴截肢的次数范围内,脊髓的再生潜力似乎并未降低。在我们开始研究时,鉴于作者们对再生脊髓的形态发生提出了一些尚未明确的问题,提出了两种对立的假设。我们怀疑有丝分裂活动本身是否足以使再生脊髓迅速恢复到与正常脊髓相当的状态。经过思考,我们倾向于这样的假设,即这种再生是由于转分化过程,该过程会在尾巴残端的组织中由截肢后的冲动引发。为了全面了解主要(如果不是唯一)负责这些现象的增殖可能性,以支持我们的这种倾向,我们还计划通过并行的双重方法进行当前的实验。因此,与过去的研究一样,我们通过核分裂分析了正在进行的增殖活动,此外,我们还试图揭示以其生命周期S期元素为象征的潜在增殖活动的可能存在。为此,选择了一种合适的增殖测试,即增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)。这种免疫细胞化学标记所揭示的有丝分裂和潜在增殖活动信号可定位在室管膜和室周灰质中。在正常脊髓中,存在不相关的核分裂活动,同时PCNA的表达相当高。与这些正在进行的和潜在的生理增殖情况相反,在再生和已再生的脊髓中,有丝分裂的数量以及显示DNA合成的细胞数量,如果不是可以忽略不计的话,也是适度的或总体上不足以维持正在进行的再生事件以及尾巴进一步截肢后可能发生的后续再生事件。基于目前可得的证据,可以假设正常尾巴截肢后的冲动会优先作用于通过免疫反应检测到的处于S期的天然无可比拟的循环细胞初始储备,这些细胞是脊髓增殖沉默潜力的储存者,这样这些细胞就会离开它们所处的待命状态,动员起来并通过M期开始分化。因此,这些未分化细胞将主要负责脊髓的首次再生事件。这样的情景会支持那些认为这些元素在再生过程中起决定性作用的作者的观点,这些作者将他们的观察仅限于尾巴的单次截肢。在这一事件之后,一旦初始的大量未分化细胞储备不可挽回地减少,那么可以推测每次新截肢后的冲击会在截肢尾巴的残端促进转分化过程,这对于随后的新脊髓再生将变得至关重要。因此,这种解释预示着,根据冲击是与尾巴的首次截肢还是后续截肢相关联,其主要目标会有所不同。在关于成年有尾两栖动物再生脊髓起源的争论中,考虑到当前数据的这种观点在一定程度上能够调和作者们先前提出的两种对立假设,并消除我们过去在先前观察时所表达的疑虑,当时在支持关于转分化活动的假设时,我们对于认为它们是这些事件的唯一原因一直有所犹豫。