Liu Long, Du Guocheng, Chen Jian, Wang Miao, Sun Jun
School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, 214122 Wuxi, China.
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2009 Oct;32(6):755-63. doi: 10.1007/s00449-009-0300-6. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
Three different dissolved oxygen (DO) control approaches were proposed to improve hyaluronic acid (HA) production: a three-stage agitation speed control approach, a two-stage DO control approach, and an oxygen vector perfluorodecalin (PFC) applied approach. In the three-stage agitation speed control approach, agitation speed was 200 rpm during 0-8 h, 400 rpm during 8-12 h, and 600 rpm during 12-20 h. In the two-stage DO control strategy, DO was controlled at above 10% during 0-8 h and at 5% during 8-20 h. In the PFC applied approach, PFC (3% v/v) was added at 8 h. HA production reached 5.5 g/L in the three-stage agitation speed control culture model, and 6.3 g/L in two-stage DO control culture model, and 6.6 g/L in the PFC applied culture model. Compared with the other two DO control approaches, the PFC applied approach had a lower shear stress and thus a higher HA production was achieved.
为提高透明质酸(HA)产量,提出了三种不同的溶解氧(DO)控制方法:三阶段搅拌速度控制法、两阶段DO控制法和氧气载体全氟萘烷(PFC)应用法。在三阶段搅拌速度控制法中,0-8小时搅拌速度为200转/分钟,8-12小时为400转/分钟,12-20小时为600转/分钟。在两阶段DO控制策略中,0-8小时DO控制在10%以上,8-20小时控制在5%。在PFC应用法中,在8小时添加PFC(3% v/v)。在三阶段搅拌速度控制培养模型中HA产量达到5.5克/升,在两阶段DO控制培养模型中为6.3克/升,在PFC应用培养模型中为6.6克/升。与其他两种DO控制方法相比,PFC应用法的剪切应力较低,因此实现了更高HA产量。