Hafkenscheid Anton, Rouckhout Danny
Sinai Centre, Jewish Mental Health Services, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
J Pers Assess. 2009 Mar;91(2):187-94. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634340.
The Impact Message Inventory-Circumplex (IMI-C; Kiesler & Schmidt, 2006) is an interpersonal personality measure purporting to capture the command and relationship messages experienced by the IMI-C respondent in her or his interactions with a target person. Mixed support for the circumplex structure of the American IMI-C was found by Schmidt, Wagner, and Kiesler (1999). In this study, we sought to establish the circumplex structure of the Dutch IMI-C adaptation (Hafkenscheid, 2003) in a group of clinician raters assessing a total of 350 psychiatric patient targets. The Dutch IMI-C exhibited closer fit to circumplex models in this study than in the Schmidt et al. (1999) study of the English language IMI-C. However, using the most stringent and conservative circumplex criteria, the circumplex structure of the Dutch IMI-C could not unequivocally be confirmed. Our findings do not justify the generation of 8 separate octant scores when the IMI-C is used as an interpersonal measurement tool. Clinical use of the IMI-C for interpersonal assessment and diagnosis should probably be limited to the location of patient targets on the 2 main dimensions of Control and Affiliation, sacrificing the specificity of octant level interpersonal assessment.
影响信息量表-环形模型(IMI-C;基斯勒和施密特,2006年)是一种人际个性测量工具,旨在捕捉IMI-C受访者在与目标人物互动中所体验到的支配和关系信息。施密特、瓦格纳和基斯勒(1999年)发现,对于美国版IMI-C的环形结构,研究结果喜忧参半。在本研究中,我们试图在一组临床评估者中确立荷兰版IMI-C改编版(哈夫肯谢德,2003年)的环形结构,这些评估者共评估了350名精神科患者目标。在本研究中,荷兰版IMI-C比施密特等人(1999年)对英语版IMI-C的研究更符合环形模型。然而,使用最严格和保守的环形标准,荷兰版IMI-C的环形结构无法得到明确证实。我们的研究结果表明,当IMI-C用作人际测量工具时,没有理由生成8个单独的八分象限分数。IMI-C在人际评估和诊断中的临床应用可能应仅限于在控制和亲和这两个主要维度上确定患者目标的位置,而牺牲八分象限水平人际评估的特异性。