• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际价值观的环形量表:信度、效度及其在人际问题和人格障碍中的适用性

Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.

作者信息

Locke K D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2000 Oct;75(2):249-67. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6.

DOI:10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6
PMID:11020143
Abstract

Three studies describe the development, psychometric properties, and potential utility of a new self-report measure, the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values (CSIV). The CSIV was designed to complement other interpersonal circumplex measures that assess interpersonal behavior by efficiently assessing a comprehensive set of agentic and communal values. The eight 8-item scales of the CSIV were shown to have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and a circumplex structure. The CSIV showed convergent and discriminant validity with measures of interpersonal traits (the Bem Sex Role Inventory; Bem, 1974), interpersonal problems (the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex; Horowitz, 2000), implicit interpersonal motives (the Thematic Apperception Test; see Atkinson, 1958), and interpersonal goals (the Interpersonal Goals Inventory; Dryer & Horowitz, 1997). Finally, the locations of the MCMI-III (Millon, 1994) personality disorder scales on the CSIV circumplex generally mirrored the locations of personality disorders on other interpersonal circumplex measures.

摘要

三项研究描述了一种新的自我报告测量工具——人际价值观环形量表(CSIV)的开发、心理测量特性及潜在效用。CSIV旨在通过有效评估一套全面的能动和社群价值观,来补充其他评估人际行为的人际环形测量工具。CSIV的八个包含8个条目的量表显示出良好的内部一致性、重测信度和环形结构。CSIV在人际特质测量(贝姆性别角色量表;贝姆,1974年)、人际问题测量(人际问题环形量表;霍洛维茨,2000年)、内隐人际动机测量(主题统觉测验;见阿特金森,1958年)以及人际目标测量(人际目标量表;德赖尔和霍洛维茨,1997年)方面表现出聚合效度和区分效度。最后,MCMI-III(米隆,1994年)人格障碍量表在CSIV环形图上的位置总体上反映了人格障碍在其他人际环形测量工具上的位置。

相似文献

1
Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.人际价值观的环形量表:信度、效度及其在人际问题和人格障碍中的适用性
J Pers Assess. 2000 Oct;75(2):249-67. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6.
2
Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring the dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex.PAI 人际关系量表测量人际关系双相模型各维度的有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):33-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.529013.
3
Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria.基于新的心理测量标准,人际个性测量显示出环形结构。
J Pers Assess. 2002 Dec;79(3):446-71. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_04.
4
Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the Interpersonal Problems model (IIP-C): construct validity and clinical implications.人际问题模型(IIP-C)的环形结构与人格障碍相关性:结构效度及临床意义
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):165-73. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.165.
5
Evaluating the interpersonal content of the MMPI-2-RF Interpersonal Scales.评估 MMPI-2-RF 人际关系量表的人际关系内容。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):187-96. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.730085. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.《柯立芝轴II量表的信效度:一种用于评估人格障碍的新量表》
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):223-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_1.
7
Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?审视对人际价值观项目环形量表的回应过程:是否应考虑理想点计分方法?
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):310-8. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1077852. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal strengths: The Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths.人际关系力量量表的编制与验证:人际关系力量量表。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):554-69. doi: 10.1037/a0017269.
9
A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC.简要评估人际关系的双相模型:IPIP-IPC。
Assessment. 2009 Dec;16(4):352-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191109340382. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
10
A circumplex model of interpersonal attributes in middle childhood.童年中期人际属性的环形模型。
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):863-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00459.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The place of subjective emptiness in the structure of personality.主观空虚在人格结构中的位置。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Dec 4;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00274-z.
2
Social Goal Orientation Differentially Influences Exposure to Interpersonal and Noninterpersonal Trauma.社会目标导向对人际创伤和非人际创伤的暴露有不同影响。
Traumatology (Tallahass Fla). 2022 Mar;28(1):138-148. doi: 10.1037/trm0000327. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Variance Decomposition of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) system: Assessing sources of influence and reliability of observations of parent-teen interactions.
连续评估人际动态系统(CAID)的方差分解:评估父母与青少年互动观察结果的影响源和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292304. eCollection 2023.
4
Extracting Agency and Communion From the Big Five: A Four-Way Competition.从大五模型中提取出主体间性和共通感:四者竞争。
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1216-1235. doi: 10.1177/10731911211003978. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Group Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP): A Pilot Study for Bipolar Depression.团体认知行为分析心理治疗系统(CBASP):双相抑郁的一项初步研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 23;11:565681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565681. eCollection 2020.
6
Development and Validation of a Circumplex Measure of the Interpersonal Culture in Work Teams and Organizations.工作团队与组织中人际文化的环形测量方法的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2019 May 1;10:850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00850. eCollection 2019.
7
The Coping Circumplex Model: An Integrative Model of the Structure of Coping With Stress.应对环状模型:一种应对压力结构的整合模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00694. eCollection 2019.
8
The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model.动机价值系统问卷(MVSQ):使用强制选择瑟斯顿IRT模型的心理测量分析
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01626. eCollection 2017.
9
Interpersonal dysfunction in personality disorders: A meta-analytic review.人格障碍中的人际功能障碍:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jul;143(7):677-734. doi: 10.1037/bul0000101. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
The Development of a Bi-Lingual Assessment Instrument to Measure Agentic and Communal Consumer Motives in English and French.一种用于测量英法双语环境下能动型和社群型消费者动机的双语评估工具的开发。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 11;7:1198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01198. eCollection 2016.