Glass Laura A, Bartels Jared M, Ryan Joseph J
University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, Missouri 64093, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16(1):19-22. doi: 10.1080/09084280802644102.
The present investigation compares WAIS-III FSIQ-WMS-III with GAI-WMS-III discrepancies in 135 male inpatients with suspected memory impairment. Full Scale IQ and GAI scores were highly correlated, r= .96, with mean values of 92.10 and 93.59, respectively. Additional analyses with the ability composites compared to each WMS-III index (IMI, GMI, and DMI), the GAI consistently produced larger difference scores than did the FSIQ; however, effect sizes were relatively small (ES= .12). Lastly, case-by-case analyses demonstrated concordance rates of 86% for the FSIQ-IMI and GAI-IMI comparisons, 85% for the FSIQ-GMI and GAI-GMI, and 82% for the FSIQ-DMI and GAI-DMI.
本研究比较了135名疑似记忆障碍男性住院患者的韦氏成人智力量表第三版（WAIS-III）全量表智商（FSIQ）与韦氏记忆量表第三版（WMS-III）之间的差异，以及一般能力指数（GAI）与WMS-III之间的差异。全量表智商和一般能力指数得分高度相关，r = 0.96，平均值分别为92.10和93.59。与每个WMS-III指数（即时记忆指数、一般记忆指数和延迟记忆指数）相比，对能力组合进行的其他分析表明，一般能力指数始终比全量表智商产生更大的差异分数；然而，效应量相对较小（ES = 0.12）。最后，逐案分析表明，FSIQ-即时记忆指数和GAI-即时记忆指数比较的一致率为86%，FSIQ-一般记忆指数和GAI-一般记忆指数比较的一致率为85%，FSIQ-延迟记忆指数和GAI-延迟记忆指数比较的一致率为82%。
