• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康经济决策模型的不确定性和验证。

Uncertainty and validation of health economic decision models.

机构信息

Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2010 Jan;19(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/hec.1444.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1444
PMID:19206080
Abstract

Health economic decision models are based on specific assumptions relating to model structure and parameter estimation. Validation of these models is recommended as an indicator of reliability, but is not commonly reported. Furthermore, models derived from different data and employing different assumptions may produce a variety of results.A Markov model for evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm is described. Internal, prospective and external validations are carried out using individual participant data from two randomised trials. Validation is assessed in terms of total numbers and timings of key events, and total costs and life-years. Since the initial model validates well only internally, two further models are developed that better fit the prospective and external validation data. All three models are then extrapolated to a life-time horizon, producing cost-effectiveness estimates ranging from pound1600 to pound4200 per life-year gained.Parameter uncertainty is now commonly addressed in health economic decision modelling. However, the derivation of models from different data sources adds another level of uncertainty. This extra uncertainty should be recognised in practical decision-making and, where possible, specifically investigated through independent model validation.

摘要

健康经济决策模型基于与模型结构和参数估计相关的特定假设。建议对这些模型进行验证,以作为可靠性的指标,但通常未予报告。此外,源自不同数据并采用不同假设的模型可能会产生多种结果。本文描述了一种用于评估腹部主动脉瘤筛查的长期成本效益的马尔可夫模型。使用两项随机试验的个体参与者数据对内、前瞻性和外部进行验证。验证是根据关键事件的总数和时间以及总成本和生命年数来评估的。由于初始模型仅在内部验证良好,因此开发了另外两个更好地拟合前瞻性和外部验证数据的模型。然后将所有三个模型外推到终生范围,得出的成本效益估计值在每获得一个生命年的 1600 英镑至 4200 英镑之间。参数不确定性现在在健康经济决策模型中得到了广泛的解决。然而,从不同数据源推导出模型会增加另一层不确定性。在实际决策中应认识到这种额外的不确定性,并在可能的情况下通过独立的模型验证来专门研究。

相似文献

1
Uncertainty and validation of health economic decision models.健康经济决策模型的不确定性和验证。
Health Econ. 2010 Jan;19(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/hec.1444.
2
Calculating when elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair improves survival for individual patients: development of the Aneurysm Repair Decision Aid and economic evaluation.计算择期腹主动脉瘤修复术何时能提高个体患者的生存率:动脉瘤修复决策辅助工具的开发与经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(32):1-154, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19320.
3
Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm.丹麦65岁男性腹主动脉瘤筛查的成本效益分析。
BMJ. 2009 Jun 24;338:b2243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2243.
4
How cost-effective is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms?腹主动脉瘤筛查的成本效益如何?
J Med Screen. 2007;14(1):46-52. doi: 10.1258/096914107780154477.
5
An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy.意大利的腹主动脉瘤筛查计划的经济评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):938-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.264. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
6
Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.医疗保健经济评估研究中的可推广性:综述与案例研究
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta8490.
7
Estimation of life-years gained and cost effectiveness based on cause-specific mortality.基于死因特异性死亡率的生命年获益和成本效益估计。
Health Econ. 2011 Jul;20(7):842-52. doi: 10.1002/hec.1648. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
8
Endovascular stents for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and economic model.血管内支架治疗腹主动脉瘤:系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13(48):1-189, 215-318, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta13480.
9
A cost-effectiveness model comparing endovascular repair to open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Canada.比较加拿大腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术与开放手术修复术的成本效益模型。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):245-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00446.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
10
A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes.对筛查项目的优先级确定与设计中建模方法的综述与批判
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(52):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-145. doi: 10.3310/hta11520.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy models for preventative interventions in cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review.心血管代谢疾病预防干预的政策模型:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 2;25(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12781-y.
2
Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Pharmacometric-Based Pharmacoeconomic Modeling in the Cost-Utility Evaluation of Sunitinib Therapy.舒尼替尼治疗成本-效用评估中传统与基于药动学的药物经济学建模的比较分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):31-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01438-z. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used in Models of the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.
糖尿病治疗模型中使用的方法学的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):19-40. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01312-4. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Development and validation of an individual-based state-transition model for the prediction of frailty and frailty-related events.开发和验证基于个体的状态转移模型,以预测虚弱和与虚弱相关的事件。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290567. eCollection 2023.
5
Investigating the cost-effectiveness of three cessation interventions on a national scale using the Economics of Smoking in Pregnancy (ESIP) decision analytical model.采用妊娠吸烟经济学(ESIP)决策分析模型,在全国范围内研究三种戒烟干预措施的成本效益。
Addiction. 2022 Nov;117(11):2907-2917. doi: 10.1111/add.15968. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
How Sensitive is Sensitivity Analysis?: Evaluation of Pharmacoeconomic Submissions in Korea.敏感性分析的敏感度如何?:韩国药物经济学申报文件评估
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 16;13:884769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.884769. eCollection 2022.
7
Appraisal of patient-level health economic models of severe mental illness: systematic review.严重精神疾病患者层面健康经济模型评估:系统评价
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 19;220(2):1-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.121.
8
Exploring Structural Uncertainty and Impact of Health State Utility Values on Lifetime Outcomes in Diabetes Economic Simulation Models: Findings from the Ninth Mount Hood Diabetes Quality-of-Life Challenge.探索健康状态效用值在糖尿病经济模拟模型中的结构不确定性及其对终生结局的影响:来自第九次胡德山糖尿病生活质量挑战赛的结果。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):599-611. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211065479. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
A Practical Guide to Modeling and Conducting a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Companion Biomarker Tests for Targeted Therapies Using R: Tutorial Paper.使用 R 对靶向治疗的伴随生物标志物测试进行建模和成本效果分析的实用指南:教程。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Dec;39(12):1373-1381. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01069-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Discrete Event Simulation for Decision Modeling in Health Care: Lessons from Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening.医疗决策建模中的离散事件模拟:腹主动脉瘤筛查的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2018 May;38(4):439-451. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17753380. Epub 2018 Apr 2.