Liu Y-P, Cao S-X, Chen S-Y, Yao Y-G, Liu T-Z
Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2009 Feb;126(1):80-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00737.x.
The aim of this study was to characterize the genetic diversity of domestic goat in China. For this purpose, we determined the sequence of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region in 72 individuals of the Yangtze River delta white goat, and reanalysed 723 published samples from 31 breeds/populations across China. All goat haplotypes were classified into four haplogroups (A-D) previously described. The phylogenetic pattern that emerged from the mtDNA control region sequence was confirmed by the analysis of the entire cytochrome b sequence of eight goats representative of the four haplogroups. It appeared that in Chinese domestic goat, haplogroups A and B were dominant and distributed in nearly all breeds/populations, while haplogroups C and D were only found in seven breeds/populations. Four breeds/populations contained all four haplogroups. When grouping the breeds/populations into five geographic groups based on their geographic distributions and ecological conditions, the southern pasturing area had the highest diversity whereas the northern farming area had the lowest diversity. 84.29% and 11.37% of the genetic variation were distributed within breeds and among breeds within the ecologically geographical areas, respectively; only 4% of genetic variation was observed among the five geographic areas. We speculate that the traditional seasonal pastoralism, the annual long-distance migrations that occurred in the past, and the commercial trade would account for the observed pattern by having favoured gene flows.
本研究的目的是表征中国家山羊的遗传多样性。为此,我们测定了72只长江三角洲白山羊个体的线粒体DNA(mtDNA)控制区序列,并重新分析了来自中国31个品种/群体的723个已发表样本。所有山羊单倍型都被归类为先前描述的四个单倍群(A - D)。通过对代表四个单倍群的八只山羊的整个细胞色素b序列进行分析,证实了从mtDNA控制区序列得出的系统发育模式。在中国家山羊中,单倍群A和B占主导地位,几乎分布于所有品种/群体,而单倍群C和D仅在七个品种/群体中发现。四个品种/群体包含所有四个单倍群。根据品种/群体的地理分布和生态条件将其分为五个地理组时,南方牧区的多样性最高,而北方农区的多样性最低。分别有84.29%和11.37%的遗传变异分布在品种内和生态地理区域内的品种间;在五个地理区域之间仅观察到4%的遗传变异。我们推测,传统的季节性游牧、过去发生的年度长途迁徙以及商业贸易通过促进基因流动,能够解释观察到的这种模式。