Laskin Carl A, Spitzer Karen A, Clark Christine A, Crowther Mark R, Ginsberg Jeff S, Hawker Gillian A, Kingdom John C, Barrett Jon, Gent Michael
University of Toronto and LifeQuest Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Toronto, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;36(2):279-87. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080763).
To compare live birth rates in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and either autoantibodies or a coagulation abnormality, treated with low molecular weight heparin plus aspirin (LMWH/ASA) or ASA alone, and to place our results in context with other randomized clinical trials (RCT) with similar cohorts.
The HepASA Trial was an RCT including patients with a history of RPL and at least 1 of the following: antiphospholipid antibody (aPL), an inherited thrombophilia, or antinuclear antibody. Treatment groups were stratified by aPL status and history of early versus late pregnancy losses. Patients received either LMWH/ASA or ASA alone. The primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included adverse events and bone loss at the spine and femoral neck. Literature over the past 20 years was reviewed to identify comparable RCT.
Over 4 years, 859 women with RPL were screened: 88 (10.2%) fulfilled inclusion criteria, became pregnant and were randomized to receive either LMWH/ASA or ASA alone. aPL were present in 42 (47.7%) patients in each group. The trial was stopped after 4 years when an interim analysis showed no difference in live birth rates in the 2 groups, and a lower rate of pregnancy loss in the ASA only group than expected. In the LMWH/ASA group, 35/45 (77.8%) had a live birth versus 34/43 (79.1%) in the ASA only group (p = 0.71). Neither number of prior losses nor aPL status was correlated with pregnancy outcome. There were no cases of pregnancy related thrombosis in either group. Mean change in BMD did not differ by treatment group at either the lumbar spine (p = 0.57) or femoral neck (p = 0.15). RCT since 2000 for aPL positive women with RPL and similar inclusion criteria report a mean live birth rate of 75% with either LMWH or ASA.
LMWH/ASA did not confer incremental benefit compared to ASA alone for this population. Regardless of treatment regimen, number of prior losses, or aPL positivity, almost 80% of women in our RPL cohort had a successful pregnancy outcome. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature that contests the emerging standard of care comprising LMWH/ASA for this population.
比较复发性流产(RPL)且伴有自身抗体或凝血异常的女性,接受低分子量肝素加阿司匹林(LMWH/ASA)或仅接受阿司匹林治疗后的活产率,并将我们的结果与其他针对类似队列的随机临床试验(RCT)进行对比。
HepASA试验是一项RCT,纳入有RPL病史且至少具备以下一项的患者:抗磷脂抗体(aPL)、遗传性血栓形成倾向或抗核抗体。治疗组根据aPL状态以及早期与晚期妊娠丢失史进行分层。患者分别接受LMWH/ASA或仅接受阿司匹林治疗。主要结局为活产;次要结局包括不良事件以及脊柱和股骨颈的骨质流失。回顾过去20年的文献以确定可比的RCT。
在4年时间里,对859名RPL女性进行了筛查:88名(10.2%)符合纳入标准,成功怀孕并被随机分配接受LMWH/ASA或仅接受阿司匹林治疗。每组42名(47.7%)患者存在aPL。4年后进行中期分析,结果显示两组活产率无差异,且仅接受阿司匹林治疗组的妊娠丢失率低于预期,该试验因此停止。在LMWH/ASA组中,45名中有35名(77.8%)活产,而仅接受阿司匹林治疗组中43名中有34名(79.1%)活产(p = 0.71)。既往流产次数和aPL状态均与妊娠结局无关。两组均未出现与妊娠相关的血栓形成病例。腰椎(p = 0.57)或股骨颈(p = 0.15)的骨密度平均变化在治疗组间无差异。自2000年以来,针对aPL阳性且有RPL且纳入标准类似的女性进行的RCT报告显示,使用LMWH或阿司匹林的平均活产率为75%。
对于该人群,与仅使用阿司匹林相比,LMWH/ASA未带来额外益处。无论治疗方案、既往流产次数或aPL阳性情况如何,我们RPL队列中近80%的女性妊娠结局成功。这些发现为越来越多对该人群采用LMWH/ASA作为新护理标准提出质疑的文献增添了内容。