• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国食品药品监督管理局的快速通道计划中寻找价值。

Finding value in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Fast Track program.

作者信息

Reichert Janice M, Rochon Stephanie L, Zhang Bodi D

机构信息

Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.

出版信息

Drug News Perspect. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):53-8. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303819.

DOI:10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303819
PMID:19209299
Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Fast Track program, created in 1997, was designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs and biologics intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions, and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs. Although the intent is laudable, the significance of designations and effectiveness of the program have recently come into question. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development has collected data on fast track candidates since 1998. We analyzed the current dataset of 344 fast track candidates granted nearly 400 designations, representing approximately 70% of the fast track designations granted by FDA, to address questions regarding common metrics. We found that fast track candidates were widely diverse in characteristics and development histories. The complexity and limitations of the data introduced biases in metrics such as clinical phase lengths and phase transition probabilities, although these could be determined for subsets of the candidates. Our results suggest that evaluation of the Fast Track program requires a nuanced approach, and estimates of the program's value should include assessment of the resulting marketed products.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的快速通道计划创建于1997年,旨在促进旨在治疗严重或危及生命疾病的药物和生物制品的开发,并加快对其审查,这些药物和生物制品显示出满足未满足医疗需求的潜力。尽管其意图值得称赞,但该计划指定的意义和有效性最近受到了质疑。塔夫茨药物开发研究中心自1998年以来一直在收集快速通道候选药物的数据。我们分析了当前包含344个快速通道候选药物的数据集,这些候选药物获得了近400个指定,约占FDA授予的快速通道指定的70%,以解决有关常见指标的问题。我们发现,快速通道候选药物在特征和开发历史方面差异很大。数据的复杂性和局限性在临床阶段时长和阶段转换概率等指标中引入了偏差,尽管可以针对候选药物的子集确定这些指标。我们的结果表明,对快速通道计划的评估需要一种细致入微的方法,并且对该计划价值的估计应包括对最终上市产品的评估。

相似文献

1
Finding value in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Fast Track program.在美国食品药品监督管理局的快速通道计划中寻找价值。
Drug News Perspect. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):53-8. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303819.
2
Promoting, improving and accelerating the drug development and approval processes.促进、改进和加速药物研发及审批流程。
Drug News Perspect. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):45-55.
3
Controlling type I error rate for fast track drug development programmes.控制快速通道药物研发项目的I型错误率。
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):665-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.1396.
4
Promoting, improving and accelerating the drug development and approval processes.促进、改进和加速药物研发及审批流程。
Drug News Perspect. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):36-43.
5
The Food and Drug Administration's early access and fast-track approval initiatives: how have they worked?美国食品药品监督管理局的早期准入和快速通道批准计划:它们的成效如何?
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(4):503-31.
6
Promoting, improving and accelerating the drug development and approval processes.促进、改进和加速药物研发及审批流程。
Drug News Perspect. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):30-8. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303816.
7
Drug development process for a product with a primary pediatric indication.具有主要儿科适应症产品的药物研发过程。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63 Suppl 12:44-9.
8
Security market reaction to FDA fast track designations.证券市场对美国食品药品监督管理局快速通道指定的反应。
J Health Care Finance. 2010 Winter;37(2):27-48.
9
A decade of the Fast Track programme.快速通道计划的十年。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Nov;7(11):885-6. doi: 10.1038/nrd2733. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
10
Accelerated approval of oncology products: a decade of experience.肿瘤学产品的加速批准:十年经验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1500-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh279.

引用本文的文献

1
New perspectives on chinese herbal medicine (zhong-yao) research and development.中药(中藥)研究与开发的新视角。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:403709. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neq056. Epub 2011 Mar 10.