• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业宠物食品保证分析与实测营养成分的比较。

Comparison of the guaranteed analysis with the measured nutrient composition of commercial pet foods.

作者信息

Hill Richard C, Choate Christina J, Scott Karen C, Molenberghs Geert

机构信息

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Feb 1;234(3):347-51. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.3.347.

DOI:10.2460/javma.234.3.347
PMID:19210254
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare guaranteed and measured concentrations of nutrients in commercial pet foods.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Annual inspection reports of pet food analyses from 5 states.

PROCEDURES

Guaranteed and measured concentrations of crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), crude fiber (CFb), moisture, and ash in pet foods were compared. The concentration difference for each nutrient was compared among types of food, target species, target life stages, manufacturers, and laboratories.

RESULTS

The guaranteed and measured concentrations of nutrients were significantly different. For all foods, mean concentration differences were as follows: CP, 1.5%; CF, 1.0%; CFb, -0.7%; moisture, -4.0%; and ash, -0.5%. Crude protein difference for treats was significantly larger than differences for dry and canned foods. Crude fat difference for dry foods was significantly less than differences for canned foods and treats. Crude fiber and moisture differences for canned foods were significantly less than the corresponding differences for dry foods and treats. Only CFb differences differed among target species, life stages, manufacturers, or laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Addition of 1.5% and 1% to the guaranteed minimums for CP and CF, respectively; subtraction of 0.7%, 4%, and 0.5% from the guaranteed maximums for CFb, moisture, and ash, respectively; and addition of 0.23 kcal/g to the as-fed metabolizable energy value calculated by use of modified Atwater factors from guaranteed analyses provides a more accurate estimate of the nutrient and metabolizable energy content of commercial pet foods. Nevertheless, the actual composition of a food should be determined whenever possible.

摘要

目的

比较商业宠物食品中营养成分的保证含量与实测含量。

设计

横断面研究。

样本总体

来自5个州的宠物食品分析年度检查报告。

程序

比较宠物食品中粗蛋白(CP)、粗脂肪(CF)、粗纤维(CFb)、水分和灰分的保证含量与实测含量。比较每种营养成分在食品类型、目标物种、目标生命阶段、制造商和实验室之间的浓度差异。

结果

营养成分的保证含量与实测含量存在显著差异。对于所有食品,平均浓度差异如下:CP为1.5%;CF为1.0%;CFb为-0.7%;水分 为-4.0%;灰分为-0.5%。零食的粗蛋白差异显著大于干粮和罐头食品的差异。干粮的粗脂肪差异显著小于罐头食品和零食的差异。罐头食品的粗纤维和水分差异显著小于干粮和零食的相应差异。只有CFb差异在目标物种、生命阶段、制造商或实验室之间有所不同。

结论及临床意义

分别在CP和CF的保证最低含量基础上增加1.5%和1%;分别在CFb、水分和灰分的保证最高含量基础上减去0.7%、4%和0.5%;并在根据保证分析中修正的阿特沃特因子计算的采食状态下的可代谢能量值基础上增加0.23千卡/克,可更准确地估计商业宠物食品的营养成分和可代谢能量含量。然而,只要有可能,都应确定食品的实际成分。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the guaranteed analysis with the measured nutrient composition of commercial pet foods.商业宠物食品保证分析与实测营养成分的比较。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Feb 1;234(3):347-51. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.3.347.
2
The impact of dietary protein source on observed and predicted metabolizable energy of dry extruded dog foods.日粮蛋白质来源对干制挤压犬粮可观察到的和预测的代谢能的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jan;85(1):204-12. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-336.
3
Prediction of digestible energy value of extruded dog food: comparison of methods.挤压型犬粮可消化能量值的预测:方法比较
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2008 Jun;92(3):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00740.x.
4
Nutritional evaluation of commercial dry dog foods by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy.利用近红外反射光谱法对市售干狗粮进行营养评估。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006 Jun;90(5-6):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00585.x.
5
Energy evaluation of extruded compound foods for dogs by near-infrared spectroscopy.采用近红外光谱法对犬用挤压复合食品进行能量评估。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2005 Apr-Jun;89(3-6):194-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00557.x.
6
Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods.选择乙醇行业的玉米副产品及其作为宠物食品成分的潜力。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Jan;87(1):189-99. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0596. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
7
Evaluation of fiber concentration in dry and canned commercial diets formulated for adult maintenance or all life stages of dogs by use of crude fiber and total dietary fiber methods.使用粗纤维和总膳食纤维方法评估用于成年犬维持期或所有生命阶段的干制和罐装商业犬粮中的纤维浓度。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Apr 1;242(7):936-40. doi: 10.2460/javma.242.7.936.
8
Feeding patterns and dietary intake in a random sample of a Swedish population of insured-dogs.瑞典参保犬随机样本的喂养模式和饮食摄入。
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Jul 1;95(3-4):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 31.
9
Bacteriologic and nutritional evaluation of a commercial raw meat diet as part of a raw meat safety program.作为生肉安全计划一部分的市售生肉饮食的细菌学和营养评估。
Zoo Biol. 2012 Sep-Oct;31(5):574-85. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20423. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
10
Comparison of procedures for assessing adequacy of dog foods.犬粮充足性评估方法的比较。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Sep 15;199(6):731-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutritional Profiling and Labeling Practices of Plant-Based, Hybrid, and Animal-Based Dog Foods: A Study of European Pack Labels (2020-2024).植物基、混合基和动物基狗粮的营养成分分析与标签标注实践:对欧洲包装标签的研究(2020 - 2024年)
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;15(13):1883. doi: 10.3390/ani15131883.
2
Assessment of the Nutritional Impact of the 10% Snack Recommendation in Pet Diets.宠物食品中10%零食推荐量的营养影响评估。
Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 18;12(3):282. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030282.
3
Current Evidence on Raw Meat Diets in Pets: A Natural Symbol, but a Nutritional Controversy.
宠物生食饮食的当前证据:一种自然的象征,但却是一场营养争议。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(3):293. doi: 10.3390/ani15030293.
4
Pre-illness dietary risk factors in dogs with chronic enteropathy.患有慢性肠炎的犬的发病前饮食风险因素。
J Vet Intern Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16872. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
5
Vegan versus meat-based cat food: Guardian-reported health outcomes in 1,369 cats, after controlling for feline demographic factors.素食猫粮与肉食猫粮对比:在控制猫咪人口统计学因素后,基于 Guardian 报道的 1369 只猫的健康结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0284132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284132. eCollection 2023.
6
Predictive equations for dietary energy are improved when independently developed for dry and wet food which could benefit both the pet and the environment.针对干粮和湿粮独立开发膳食能量预测方程时,方程会得到改进,这对宠物和环境都有益。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 21;10:1104695. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1104695. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of graded levels of corn-fermented protein on stool quality, apparent nutrient digestibility, and palatability in healthy adult cats.评价玉米发酵蛋白的分级水平对健康成年猫粪便质量、表观养分消化率和适口性的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Dec 1;100(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac354.
8
From Nutritional Adequacy to Hygiene Quality: A Detailed Assessment of Commercial Raw Pet-Food for Dogs and Cats.从营养充足到卫生质量:对猫狗商业生宠物食品的详细评估
Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;12(18):2395. doi: 10.3390/ani12182395.
9
Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health.素食犬粮与肉食犬粮:基于 Guardian 报道的健康指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 13;17(4):e0265662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265662. eCollection 2022.
10
A Comparison of Key Essential Nutrients in Commercial Plant-Based Pet Foods Sold in Canada to American and European Canine and Feline Dietary Recommendations.加拿大销售的商业植物基宠物食品中关键必需营养素与美国和欧洲犬猫饮食建议的比较。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 9;11(8):2348. doi: 10.3390/ani11082348.