Onder Ali Mirza, Chandar Jayanthi, Coakley Sheila, Francoeur Denise, Abitbol Carolyn, Zilleruelo Gaston
Department of Pediatrics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506-9214, USA.
Hemodial Int. 2009 Jan;13(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2009.00348.x.
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether the application of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing (Biopatch) at the exit site of tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters has any effect on the incidence and etiology of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). This study was carried out over a 5-year period in a single center, where, in the first 2(1/2) years, the exit sites were cleansed with betadine at every hemodialysis session and then covered with a transparent dressing (pre-Biopatch Era). During the next 2(1/2) years, Biopatch was applied to the exit site once a week after cleansing with betadine, and then covered with a transparent dressing (Biopatch Era). The application of Biopatch significantly decreased the incidence of exit site infections (ESI) (P<0.05). However, there was no difference in the incidence of CRBs or their microbiological distribution. The improved ESI rate had no effect on the overall catheter survival time. The antimicrobial sensitivities of the Gram-positive microorganisms were statistically different for the 2 different types of infections (P<0.05). In conclusion, even though Biopatch is effective in decreasing the incidence of ESI, it has no effect on the incidence of CRB, the etiology of CRB, or the overall catheter survival time. The distinct difference between the antimicrobial sensitivities of the ESI and CRB suggests that they are not a spectrum of the same pathogenesis. These preliminary data support the intraluminal pathogenesis of CRB, rather than the exit site as a possible entry point for the extraluminal route.
这项回顾性研究的目的是调查在带隧道涤纶套的血液透析导管出口处应用洗必泰浸渍敷料(生物贴片)是否对导管相关菌血症(CRB)的发生率和病因有任何影响。本研究在单一中心进行了5年,在前2.5年中,每次血液透析时用碘伏清洁出口处,然后覆盖透明敷料(生物贴片使用前时期)。在接下来的2.5年中,用碘伏清洁后每周在出口处应用一次生物贴片,然后覆盖透明敷料(生物贴片时期)。生物贴片的应用显著降低了出口处感染(ESI)的发生率(P<0.05)。然而,CRB的发生率或其微生物分布没有差异。ESI发生率的改善对导管总体生存时间没有影响。两种不同类型感染的革兰氏阳性微生物的抗菌敏感性在统计学上有差异(P<0.05)。总之,尽管生物贴片在降低ESI发生率方面有效,但它对CRB的发生率、CRB的病因或导管总体生存时间没有影响。ESI和CRB的抗菌敏感性之间的明显差异表明它们不是同一发病机制的一个谱系。这些初步数据支持CRB的腔内发病机制,而不是出口处作为腔外途径的可能入口点。