• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于基于模拟器的心脏体格检查能力评估的心脏检查清单的开发与验证。

Development and validation of a cardiac findings checklist for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence.

作者信息

Hatala Rose, Scalese Ross J, Cole Gary, Bacchus Maria, Kassen Barry, Issenberg S Barry

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia (R.H., B.K.), Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Simul Healthc. 2009 Spring;4(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318183142b.

DOI:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318183142b
PMID:19212246
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Objective outcome measures for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence are lacking. The current study describes the development and validation of an approach to scoring performance using a cardiac findings checklist.

METHODS

A cardiac findings checklist was developed and implemented for use with a simulator-based assessment of cardiac physical examination competence at a Canadian national specialty examination in internal medicine. Candidate performance as measured using the checklist was compared with global ratings of clinical performance on the cardiac patient simulator and with overall examination performance.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability for scoring the checklist ranged from 0.95 for scoring correct findings to 0.72 for scoring incorrect findings. A summary checklist score had a Pearson correlation of 0.60 with overall candidate performance on the simulator-based station.

CONCLUSION

Use of a cardiac findings checklist provides one objective measure of cardiac physical examination competence that may be used with simulator-based assessments.

摘要

引言

缺乏用于基于模拟器的心脏体格检查能力评估的客观结果指标。本研究描述了一种使用心脏检查清单对表现进行评分的方法的开发与验证。

方法

制定并实施了一份心脏检查清单,用于加拿大内科专业国家考试中基于模拟器的心脏体格检查能力评估。将使用该清单衡量的考生表现与心脏病人模拟器上的临床表现总体评分以及整体考试表现进行比较。

结果

对清单评分的评分者间信度,正确发现评分的范围为0.95,错误发现评分的范围为0.72。清单总分与基于模拟器的考站中考生的总体表现的Pearson相关系数为0.60。

结论

使用心脏检查清单可提供一种心脏体格检查能力的客观指标,可用于基于模拟器的评估。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a cardiac findings checklist for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence.用于基于模拟器的心脏体格检查能力评估的心脏检查清单的开发与验证。
Simul Healthc. 2009 Spring;4(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318183142b.
2
Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study.使用模拟技术和真实患者评估心脏体格检查技能:一项比较研究。
Med Educ. 2008 Jun;42(6):628-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02953.x. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
3
Assessing the relationship between cardiac physical examination technique and accurate bedside diagnosis during an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间评估心脏体格检查技术与准确床边诊断之间的关系。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S26-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814002f1.
4
A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB").在一项评估工具验证中,对全球评定量表和检查表评分进行比较,该评估工具用于评估模拟紧急情况下危重症患者复苏的表现(简称为“CRM模拟器研究IB”)。
Simul Healthc. 2009 Spring;4(1):6-16. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181880472.
5
Does physical examination competence correlate with bedside diagnostic acumen? An observational study.
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):199-203. doi: 10.1080/01421590701316506.
6
Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anesthesia simulator.麻醉模拟器中本科性能评估的有效性和可靠性。
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Mar;48(3):225-33. doi: 10.1007/BF03019750.
7
Assessing bedside cardiologic examination skills using "Harvey," a cardiology patient simulator.使用心脏病患者模拟器“哈维”评估床边心脏检查技能。
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Oct;4(10):980-5.
8
Performance of a consensus scoring algorithm for assessing pediatric advanced life support competency using a computer screen-based simulator.使用基于计算机屏幕的模拟器评估儿科高级生命支持能力的共识评分算法的性能。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;10(6):623-35. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b00ee4.
9
Validity and generalizability of global ratings in an objective structured clinical examination.客观结构化临床考试中整体评分的效度与可推广性
Acad Med. 1991 Sep;66(9):545-8.
10
Effects of item and rater characteristics on checklist recording: what should we look for?条目和评分者特征对检查表记录的影响:我们应该关注什么?
Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):852-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02226.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.评价一种结构化、模拟辅助、以同伴为基础的培训在三年级医学生心血管体格检查中的有效性:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Sep 15;38(6):Doc108. doi: 10.3205/zma001504. eCollection 2021.
2
Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.教育评估的验证:模拟及其他领域的入门指南。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Dec 7;1:31. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y. eCollection 2016.
3
Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments.
支持基于高风险模拟评估的评分员培训。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Fall;32(4):279-86. doi: 10.1002/chp.21156.
4
Validation of a detailed scoring checklist for use during advanced cardiac life support certification.用于高级心脏生命支持认证的详细评分检查表的验证。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Aug;7(4):222-35. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182590b07.