Gençoglu Nimet, Oruçoglu Hasan, Helvacıoḡlu Dilek
Professor, Department of Endodontics,University of Marmara, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Dent. 2007 Apr;1(2):97-103.
To investigate apical leakage of roots filled with 6 different gutta-percha techniques; Thermafil, JS Quick-Fill, Soft Core, Microseal, System B and lateral condensation using a new computerized filtration meter.
60 extracted single rooted teeth were used. Coronal part of each tooth was removed and the root canals were prepared with step-back technique. The roots were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth, filled by one of the obturation technique and Kerr sealer. The teeth were kept in 100% humidity for 2 years. After this period, apical parts of roots (10 +/- 0.05 mm) were attached to computerized fluid filtration meter. Apical leakage quantity was determined as mul.cmH(2)O(-1).min(-1).
Statistical analysis indicated that Thermafil, Soft Core, Quick-Fill and System B techniques showed lower leakage than Microseal and lateral condensation (P < .05). However, statistically no difference was found among the core techniques and no difference was found between microseal and lateral condensation techniques (P > .05).
Thermafil, Soft Core, Quick-Fill and System B techniques showed lower leakage than Microseal and lateral condensation. In addition, this new computerized fluid filtration meter allowed quantitative measurement of leakage easily.
使用一种新型计算机化过滤仪,研究采用6种不同牙胶技术(热牙胶充填技术、JS快速充填技术、软核技术、微封闭技术、System B技术和侧向加压充填技术)进行根管充填后的根尖微渗漏情况。
使用60颗拔除的单根牙。去除每颗牙的冠部,采用逐步后退技术预备根管。将牙根随机分为6组,每组10颗牙,分别采用一种充填技术和 Kerr 封闭剂进行充填。将牙齿置于100%湿度环境中保存2年。在此之后,将牙根的根尖部分(10±0.05 mm)连接到计算机化流体过滤仪上。根尖微渗漏量以μl.cmH₂O⁻¹.min⁻¹为单位进行测定。
统计分析表明,热牙胶充填技术、软核技术、快速充填技术和System B技术的渗漏率低于微封闭技术和侧向加压充填技术(P < 0.05)。然而,在核心技术之间未发现统计学差异,微封闭技术和侧向加压充填技术之间也未发现差异(P > 0.05)。
热牙胶充填技术、软核技术、快速充填技术和System B技术的渗漏率低于微封闭技术和侧向加压充填技术。此外,这种新型计算机化流体过滤仪能够轻松地对微渗漏进行定量测量。