Hulin Anne, Blanchet Benoît, Audard Vincent, Barau Caroline, Furlan Valérie, Durrbach Antoine, Taïeb Fabrice, Lang Philippe, Grimbert Philippe, Tod Michel
Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, UMR CNRS 7054, AP-HP, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Apr;31(2):224-32. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c077c.
A significant relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the risk for rejection has been reported. Based on 3 concentration measurements, 3 approaches have been proposed for the estimation of MPA AUC, involving either a multilinear regression approach model (MLRA) or a Bayesian estimation using either gamma absorption or zero-order absorption population models. The aim of the study was to compare the 3 approaches for the estimation of MPA AUC in 150 renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. The population parameters were determined in 77 patients (learning study). The AUC estimation methods were compared in the learning population and in 73 patients from another center (validation study). In the latter study, the reference AUCs were estimated by the trapezoidal rule on 8 measurements. MPA concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. The gamma absorption model gave the best fit. In the learning study, the AUCs estimated by both Bayesian methods were very similar, whereas the multilinear approach was highly correlated but yielded estimates about 20% lower than Bayesian methods. This resulted in dosing recommendations differing by 250 mg/12 h or more in 27% of cases. In the validation study, AUC estimates based on the Bayesian method with gamma absorption model and multilinear regression approach model were, respectively, 12% higher and 7% lower than the reference values. To conclude, the bicompartmental model with gamma absorption rate gave the best fit. The 3 AUC estimation methods are highly correlated but not concordant. For a given patient, the same estimation method should always be used.
已有报道称血浆浓度-时间曲线下霉酚酸(MPA)面积(AUC)与排斥反应风险之间存在显著关系。基于3次浓度测量,已提出3种估计MPA AUC的方法,涉及多线性回归方法模型(MLRA)或使用伽马吸收或零级吸收总体模型的贝叶斯估计。本研究的目的是比较150例接受霉酚酸酯和他克莫司治疗的肾移植患者中3种估计MPA AUC的方法。在77例患者中确定总体参数(学习研究)。在学习总体以及来自另一个中心的73例患者中比较AUC估计方法(验证研究)。在后一项研究中,通过梯形法则对8次测量结果估计参考AUC。通过液相色谱法测量MPA浓度。伽马吸收模型拟合效果最佳。在学习研究中,两种贝叶斯方法估计的AUC非常相似,而多线性方法高度相关,但得出的估计值比贝叶斯方法低约20%。这导致在27%的病例中给药建议相差250 mg/12 h或更多。在验证研究中,基于伽马吸收模型的贝叶斯方法和多线性回归方法模型估计的AUC分别比参考值高12%和低7%。总之,具有伽马吸收率的双室模型拟合效果最佳。3种AUC估计方法高度相关但不一致。对于给定患者,应始终使用相同的估计方法。