Sontineni Siva Prasad, White Michael, Singh Sindhu, Arouni Amy, Cloutier David, Nair Chandra K, Mohiuddin Syed M
Division of Cardiology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Can J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;25(2):e36-41. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70482-9.
Septic thrombosis of the right atrium is an unusual complication associated with the use of indwelling devices. The optimal management of this condition is unclear. Our experience with a patient with hemodialysis catheter-related septic thrombosis of the right atrium illustrates the difficulties associated with this condition.
To determine the effects of surgical thrombectomy compared with nonsurgical treatment with antibiotics (with or without anticoagulation) on mortality rates and complications in patients with device-related septic thrombosis of the right atrium.
A retrospective analysis of all reported cases of device-related right heart septic thrombosis in which therapy and outcome were reported was conducted using a PubMed search in the English-language literature (1985 to 2006).
Forty cases of device-related right atrial septic thromboses were reported in the literature during the chosen time period. The treatments administered were none (12.5%), antibiotics (12.5%), antibiotics and anticoagulation (20%), and thrombectomy (55%). The mean clot size was significantly larger in patients who underwent thrombectomy. All untreated patients died. Excluding the untreated patients from the analysis, systemic complications were significantly lower in the thrombectomy group than in the groups receiving nonsurgical therapies. Using multivariate modelling with survival as the primary outcome, age, sex, clot size, clot location, microbial organism or type of treatment were not predictive of the outcome.
Device-related right atrial septic thrombosis is associated with significant mortality and is uniformly fatal if untreated. Surgical thrombectomy is associated with less frequent systemic complications. A well-designed prospective, randomized trial is needed to determine the optimal treatment of this condition.
右心房感染性血栓形成是与留置装置使用相关的一种罕见并发症。这种情况的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。我们对一名患有血液透析导管相关右心房感染性血栓形成患者的治疗经验说明了这种情况所带来的困难。
确定与使用抗生素(联合或不联合抗凝治疗)的非手术治疗相比,手术取栓术对右心房装置相关感染性血栓形成患者死亡率和并发症的影响。
通过在英文文献(1985年至2006年)中使用PubMed搜索,对所有报道了治疗方法和结果的装置相关右心感染性血栓形成病例进行回顾性分析。
在选定时间段内,文献报道了40例装置相关右心房感染性血栓形成病例。所采用的治疗方法为未治疗(12.5%)、抗生素治疗(12.5%)、抗生素联合抗凝治疗(2O%)以及取栓术(55%)。接受取栓术患者的平均血栓大小明显更大。所有未治疗患者均死亡。在分析中排除未治疗患者后,取栓术组的全身并发症明显低于接受非手术治疗的组。以生存作为主要结局进行多变量建模时发现,年龄、性别、血栓大小、血栓位置、微生物种类或治疗类型均不能预测结局。
装置相关右心房感染性血栓形成与显著的死亡率相关,若不治疗则必然致命。手术取栓术相关的全身并发症较少。需要开展一项设计良好的前瞻性随机试验来确定这种情况的最佳治疗方法。