Nizard Jacky, Haberman Shoshana, Paltieli Yoav, Gonen Ron, Ohel Gonen, Le Bourthe Yannick, Ville Yves
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHI Poissy Saint Germain, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Poissy, France.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):404.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.051. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
The purpose of this study was to compare the ultrasound-based LaborPro (Trig Medical Ltd, Yokneam, Israel) system determination of fetal head station and position with routine vaginal examination.
This prospective study, which was conducted in 3 centers included 311 measurements that were performed in 166 singleton term pregnancies during the active phase of vertex, uncomplicated labor. Ultrasound-based position-tracking system calculations of fetal head station and position were compared with routine vaginal examination measurements.
Comparison of vaginal examination with the system head station results revealed a mean absolute difference of 5.5 +/- 6.1 mm (n = 311). Vaginal examination head-position evaluation, within a 45 degrees interval, complied with the system in 35 of 87 cases (40.2%).
Our data show that an ultrasound-based system can determine fetal head station and position during labor, when compared with vaginal examination, and requires minimal ultrasound skills. The limits of vaginal examination assessment of the head position are in agreement with published data.
本研究旨在比较基于超声的LaborPro(Trig Medical Ltd,以色列约克奈姆)系统测定胎儿头部位置和入盆情况与常规阴道检查的结果。
这项前瞻性研究在3个中心进行,纳入了166例单胎足月妊娠且处于活跃期、无并发症的头位分娩过程中的311次测量。将基于超声的胎儿头部位置和入盆情况追踪系统的计算结果与常规阴道检查测量结果进行比较。
阴道检查与系统头部入盆结果比较,平均绝对差异为5.5±6.1毫米(n = 311)。在45度间隔内,阴道检查头部位置评估与系统结果相符的情况在87例中有35例(40.2%)。
我们的数据表明,与阴道检查相比,基于超声的系统能够在分娩期间测定胎儿头部位置和入盆情况,且所需超声技能最少。阴道检查对头位评估的局限性与已发表的数据一致。