Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建中使用骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物和半腱肌-股薄肌自体移植物进行胫骨固定:可吸收螺钉与可吸收交叉针固定的比较

Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis autografts: a comparison between bioabsorbable screws and bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation.

作者信息

Volpi Piero, Marinoni Luca, Bait Corrado, Galli Marco, de Girolamo Laura

机构信息

IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):808-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328413. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knee instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rarely manifests with activities of daily living, but it may occur in high-level sports performance, resulting in secondary injuries. Faced with these circumstances, sports orthopaedists have continued to improve on the results obtained with surgical techniques for treating knee joint injuries.

HYPOTHESIS

Transverse tibial fixation with bioabsorbable cross pins is a valid technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with both the patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) and semitendinosus and gracilis tendon.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The study population was 120 patients operated on by the same surgeon and subdivided into 4 subgroups of 30 subjects each. Patients were chosen and assigned to each group consecutively. Patients in group 1 (bone-patellar tendon-bone) were implanted with bioabsorbable interference screws, group 2 (bone-patellar tendon-bone) received 2 bioabsorbable cross pins, group 3 (semitendinosus and gracilis tendon) received a bioabsorbable interference screw, and group 4 (semitendinosus and gracilis tendon) received 2 bioabsorbable cross pins. Patients were assessed at 5-year follow-up for International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Form, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Lysholm-Tegner Activity Scale, and KT-1000 arthrometer testing.

RESULTS

The results at 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were similar across all 4 groups. No significant differences have been observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that transverse tibial fixation with bioabsorbable cross pins is a safe and reliable procedure, yielding clinical results that are comparable with those of the more widely used bioabsorbable interference screws.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节不稳定在日常生活活动中很少出现,但在高水平运动表现中可能发生,导致继发性损伤。面对这些情况,运动骨科医生不断改进治疗膝关节损伤的手术技术所取得的效果。

假设

使用生物可吸收交叉针进行胫骨横向固定是一种用于髌腱(骨-髌腱-骨)以及半腱肌和股薄肌腱前交叉韧带重建的有效技术。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

研究人群为120例由同一位外科医生进行手术的患者,分为4个亚组,每组30名受试者。患者连续入选并分配到每组。第1组(骨-髌腱-骨)患者植入生物可吸收加压螺钉,第2组(骨-髌腱-骨)接受2枚生物可吸收交叉针,第3组(半腱肌和股薄肌腱)接受1枚生物可吸收加压螺钉,第4组(半腱肌和股薄肌腱)接受2枚生物可吸收交叉针。在5年随访时,根据国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节韧带标准评估表、Lysholm膝关节评分量表、Lysholm-Tegner活动量表以及KT-1000关节测量仪测试对患者进行评估。

结果

所有4组在前交叉韧带重建术后5年的结果相似。各亚组间未观察到显著差异。

结论

结果表明,使用生物可吸收交叉针进行胫骨横向固定是一种安全可靠的手术方法,其临床效果与更广泛使用的生物可吸收加压螺钉相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验