Lopes Andréa Diniz, Vilar e Furtado Ricardo de, Silva César Augusto da, Yi Liu Chiao, Malfatti Cristina Assumpção, Araújo Silvana Antunes de
Centro de Reabilitação, Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(2):121-5. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000200009.
The purpose of the present study was to compare self-report and interview administration methods using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.
Thirty male and female patients over 18 years of age with rotator cuff disorders (tendinopathy or rotator cuff tear) and Brazilian Portuguese as their primary language were recruited for assessment via administration of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. A randomization method was used to determine whether the questionnaires would be self-reported (n=15) or administered by an interviewer (n=15). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in each group. The t-test was used to determine whether the difference in mean questionnaire scores and administration time was statistically significant. For statistical analysis, the level of significance was set at 5%.
The mean subject age was 55.07 years, ranging from 27 to 74 years. Most patients had a diagnosis of tendinopathy (n=21). With regard to level of schooling, the majority (n=26) of subjects had completed a college degree or higher. The mean questionnaire scores and administration times did not significantly differ between the two groups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) between Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and strong correlations were found between the questionnaires in both groups.
There are no differences between the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire administration methods with regard to administration time or correlations between the questionnaires.
本研究旨在比较在肩袖疾病患者中使用西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH)的自我报告法和访谈法。
招募30名18岁以上、以巴西葡萄牙语为主要语言、患有肩袖疾病(肌腱病或肩袖撕裂)的男性和女性患者,通过发放西安大略肩袖指数和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷进行评估。采用随机化方法确定问卷是自我报告(n = 15)还是由访谈者发放(n = 15)。使用Pearson相关系数评估每组中西安大略肩袖指数与上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷之间的相关性。采用t检验确定问卷平均得分和发放时间的差异是否具有统计学意义。统计学分析中,显著性水平设定为5%。
受试者的平均年龄为55.07岁,范围在27至74岁之间。大多数患者被诊断为肌腱病(n = 21)。在受教育程度方面,大多数受试者(n = 26)完成了大学学位或更高学历。两组之间的问卷平均得分和发放时间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。西安大略肩袖指数与上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷之间存在统计学显著相关性(p<0.05),并且在两组问卷之间发现了强相关性。
在发放时间或问卷之间的相关性方面,西安大略肩袖指数和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷的发放方法没有差异。