Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor Street, (M/C 066), Chicago, IL 60706, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):710-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01155.x. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
Hunting of hornbills by tribal communities is widespread in logged foothill forests of the Indian Eastern Himalaya. We investigated whether the decline of hornbills has affected the dispersal and recruitment of 3 large-seeded tree species. We hypothesized that 2 low-fecundity tree species, Chisocheton paniculatus and Dysoxylum binectariferum (Meliaceae) bearing arillate fruits, are more dispersal limited than a prolifically fruiting drupaceous tree Polyalthia simiarum (Annonaceae), which has potential dispersers other than hornbills. We estimated the abundance of large avian frugivores during the fruiting season along transects in 2 protected and 2 disturbed forests. We compared recruitment of the tree species near (<10 m) and far (10-40 m) from parent trees at protected and disturbed sites. Median abundance of Great (Buceros bicornis), Wreathed (Aceros undulatus), and Oriental Pied Hornbills (Anthracoceros albirostris) were significantly lower in disturbed forests, but sites did not differ in abundances of the Mountain Imperial Pigeon (Ducula badia). Overall, tree species showed more severely depressed recruitment of seedlings (77% fewer) and juveniles (69% fewer) in disturbed than in protected forests. In disturbed forests, 93% fewer seedlings of C. paniculatus were beyond parental crowns, and a high number of all seedlings (42%) accumulated directly under reproductive adults. In contrast, D. binectariferum and P. simiarum were recruitment rather than dispersal limited, with fewer dispersed seedlings surviving in disturbed than in protected forests. Results are consistent with the idea that disturbance disrupts mutualisms between hornbills and some large-seeded food plants, with the caveat that role redundancy within even small and specialized disperser assemblages renders other tree species less vulnerable to loss of regular dispersal agents.
部落社区对犀鸟的捕猎在印度喜马拉雅山东部的采伐迹地山麓森林中非常普遍。我们调查了犀鸟数量的减少是否影响了 3 种大种子树种的扩散和繁殖。我们假设,2 种果实具假种皮的低繁殖力树种,Chisocheton paniculatus 和 Dysoxylum binectariferum(芸香科),比繁殖力强的核果类树 Polyalthia simiarum(番荔枝科)更受扩散限制,而后者除了犀鸟之外还有其他潜在的传播者。我们在 2 个保护区和 2 个干扰区的样带上,在果实季节估算了大型鸟类食果者的丰度。我们比较了在保护区和干扰区,离亲树近(<10 米)和远(10-40 米)的地方,这些树种的繁殖情况。在干扰林分中,大型的白喉犀鸟(Buceros bicornis)、弯嘴犀鸟(Aceros undulatus)和东方白腿犀鸟(Anthracoceros albirostris)的中位数丰度明显较低,但在山地皇鸠(Ducula badia)的丰度上,不同样地之间没有差异。总体而言,与保护区相比,在干扰林分中,树种的幼苗(减少 77%)和幼树(减少 69%)的繁殖情况明显更差。在干扰林分中,C. paniculatus 的 93%的幼苗都没有超出亲树冠层,而所有幼苗中有很大一部分(42%)直接堆积在繁殖成体下。相比之下,D. binectariferum 和 P. simiarum 的繁殖情况不受扩散限制,在干扰林分中,扩散出去的幼苗比在保护区中存活的幼苗少。研究结果与以下观点一致,即干扰破坏了犀鸟和一些大种子食物植物之间的共生关系,但需要注意的是,即使在小型和专业化的传播者集合体中,角色冗余也会使其他树种不易受到常规传播者丧失的影响。