• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者寻路效能量表韩文版的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the way-finding effectiveness scale for persons with dementia.

作者信息

Hong Gwi-Ryung Son, Lim YoungMi

机构信息

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1625-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02649.x. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02649.x
PMID:19220622
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Way-finding Effectiveness Scale (WES) for Korean persons with dementia (PWDs).

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional survey method was used.

METHODS

Data were collected with a non-probability sampling strategy using structured format face-to-face interviews. A convenience sample of 83 community-dwelling PWDs and their family caregivers were recruited. The participants were PWDs who were over 60 years of age, had been medically diagnosed with dementia or showed signs and symptoms of dementia, had a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of less than 24 of 30 and were independent in walking.

RESULTS

Internal consistency for the 29-item KWES was 0.93 and exceeded 0.70 for the four subscales (complex way-finding goals, CWG; analytic strategy, AS; global strategy, GS; and simple way-finding goals, SWG). The intercorrelations for total KWES and subscales demonstrated a high to moderate relationship ranging from 0.84 (total and CWG) to 0.24 (AS and SWG). Pearson correlations between each subscale scores of the KWES and K-MMSE demonstrated significant, moderate relationships ranging from 0.41 (CWG and K-MSE) to 0.28 (AS and K-MMSE). Differences in current and prior behaviour of KWES were significant for the total (t = -21.00, p < 0.001) and subscales (t = -28.33--9.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acceptable reliabilities and validities support the conclusion that the KWES is a valid and reliable instrument for examining way-finding effectiveness for Korean PWDs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The KWES will contribute to the development of understanding of way-finding ability for community-dwelling PWDs in both research and clinical practices.

摘要

目的

评估韩国版寻路效能量表(WES)在韩国痴呆症患者(PWDs)中的心理测量特性。

设计

采用描述性横断面调查方法。

方法

使用结构化格式的面对面访谈,通过非概率抽样策略收集数据。招募了83名社区居住的痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者作为便利样本。参与者为60岁以上、经医学诊断患有痴呆症或有痴呆症体征和症状、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分在30分制中低于24分且行走独立的痴呆症患者。

结果

29项韩国版寻路效能量表(KWES)的内部一致性为0.93,四个子量表(复杂寻路目标,CWG;分析策略,AS;全局策略,GS;简单寻路目标,SWG)均超过0.70。KWES总量表与子量表之间的相互关系显示出高到中等的相关性,范围从0.84(总量表与CWG)到0.24(AS与SWG)。KWES各子量表得分与韩国版简易精神状态检查表(K-MMSE)之间的皮尔逊相关性显示出显著显著显著显著的中等关系,范围从0.41(CWG与K-MMSE)到0.28(AS与K-MMSE)。KWES当前与先前行为的差异在总量表(t = -21.00,p < 0.001)和子量表(t = -28.33--9.33,p < 0.001)中均具有显著性。

结论

可接受的信度和效度支持以下结论:KWES是用于检验韩国痴呆症患者寻路效能的有效且可靠的工具。

与临床实践的相关性

KWES将有助于在研究和临床实践中加深对社区居住痴呆症患者寻路能力的理解。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the way-finding effectiveness scale for persons with dementia.痴呆症患者寻路效能量表韩文版的信度和效度
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1625-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02649.x. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
2
Translation and validation of the Revised-Algase Wandering Scale (community version) among Korean elders with dementia.修订版阿尔加西游荡量表(社区版)在韩国老年痴呆症患者中的翻译与验证
Aging Ment Health. 2006 Mar;10(2):143-50. doi: 10.1080/13607860600609058.
3
Relationship between familiar environment and wandering behaviour among Korean elders with dementia.韩国老年痴呆症患者的熟悉环境与徘徊行为之间的关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(9):1365-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02566.x. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
4
Factors affecting burden of family caregivers of community-dwelling ambulatory elders with dementia in Korea.影响韩国社区居住的痴呆症非卧床老年人家庭照顾者负担的因素。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008 Aug;22(4):226-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2007.12.005.
5
Validation of the Algase Wandering Scale (Version 2) in a cross cultural sample.阿尔加斯游走量表(第2版)在跨文化样本中的验证
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Mar;8(2):133-42. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001649644.
6
Development of a Korean version of the behavior rating scale for dementia (BRSD-K).韩国版痴呆行为评定量表(BRSD-K)的开发。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;23(7):677-84. doi: 10.1002/gps.1960.
7
Measure of quality of life for Taiwanese persons with early to moderate dementia and related factors.台湾轻度至中度失智症患者的生活质量测量及相关因素
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;23(6):580-5. doi: 10.1002/gps.1938.
8
Initial psychometric evaluation of the Wayfinding Effectiveness Scale.寻路有效性量表的初步心理测量评估。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Dec;29(8):1015-32. doi: 10.1177/0193945907303076. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
9
[A preliminary study on the Korean version of quality of life-Alzheimer's disease (QOL-AD) scale in community-dwelling elderly with dementia].[韩国版痴呆症社区居住老年人生活质量-阿尔茨海默病(QOL-AD)量表的初步研究]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 May;39(3):243-8.
10
Developing a Chinese quality of life in dementia instrument for patients with early-to-moderate dementia: an exploratory test of validity.开发一种用于早期至中度痴呆患者的中文版痴呆患者生活质量量表:一项有效性的探索性测试。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Aug;19(15-16):2174-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03254.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales.测量老年患者的疼痛强度:五种量表的比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05127-6.
2
Development and Validation of the Way-Finding Ability Scale for Middle-Aged and Older Adults.中老年人群寻路能力量表的编制与验证
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2017 Dec;16(4):95-103. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2017.16.4.95. Epub 2017 Dec 31.