MacLeod Colin, Koster Ernst H W, Fox Elaine
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):89-99. doi: 10.1037/a0014878.
This commentary reviews key theoretical, methodological, and clinical issues raised by recent research on cognitive bias modification (CBM). The authors identify the major ways in which the new work reported within this special section extends earlier CBM research. In particular, they note that it considers a wider range of participants, includes a greater diversity of symptoms measures, and targets for change a broader array of processing biases than previously has been the case. Furthermore, they point out that the present work develops and employs a more diverse arsenal of bias modification procedures, in some cases delivered across extended periods of time within naturalistic settings. They also draw attention to methodological limitations associated with the current studies, offering recommendations concerning how future CBM research might profitably build upon these exciting new directions while overcoming such limitations. Finally, they evaluate the theoretical and applied implications of the reported findings, discussing their capacity to illuminate the causal contributions made by cognitive bias to emotional vulnerability and their promise concerning the potential therapeutic value of CBM as a clinical tool.
本评论回顾了近期关于认知偏差修正(CBM)研究提出的关键理论、方法和临床问题。作者确定了本特刊中报道的新研究扩展早期CBM研究的主要方式。他们特别指出,新研究考虑了更广泛的参与者,纳入了更多样化的症状测量方法,并且针对改变的加工偏差范围比以往更广泛。此外,他们指出,目前的研究开发并采用了更多样化的偏差修正程序,在某些情况下,这些程序是在自然环境中长时间实施的。他们还提请注意当前研究中存在的方法学局限性,并就未来CBM研究如何在克服这些局限性的同时,从这些令人兴奋的新方向中受益提出建议。最后,他们评估了所报道研究结果的理论和应用意义,讨论了这些结果阐明认知偏差对情绪易感性的因果贡献的能力,以及CBM作为一种临床工具的潜在治疗价值的前景。