Khan Seema A, Lankes Heather A, Patil Deepa B, Bryk Michele, Hou Nanjiang, Ivancic David, Nayar Ritu, Masood Shahla, Rademaker Alfred
Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Superior Street, Lurie 4-133, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Mar;2(3):265-73. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0119. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
Effective methods of serial epithelial sampling to measure breast-specific biomarkers will aid the rapid evaluation of new preventive interventions. We report here a proof-of-principle phase 2 study to assess the utility of ductal lavage (DL) to measure biomarkers of tamoxifen action. We enrolled women with a 5-year breast cancer risk estimate >1.6% or the unaffected breast of women with T1a or T1b breast cancer. After entry DL, participants chose tamoxifen or observation and underwent repeat DL 6 months later. Samples were processed for cytology and immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor alpha, Ki-67, and cyclooxygenase-2. Of 182 women recruited, 115 (63%) underwent entry and repeat DL; 85 (47%) had sufficient cells for analysis from > or =1 duct at both time points; in 78 (43%), cells were sufficient from > or =1 matched ducts. Forty-six women chose observation and 39 chose tamoxifen. We observed greater reductions in the tamoxifen group than in the observation group for Ki-67 (adjusted P = 0.03) and estrogen receptor alpha (adjusted P = 0.07), but not in cyclooxygenase-2 (adjusted P = 0.4) labeling. Cytologic findings showed a trend toward improvement in the tamoxifen group compared with the observation group. Interobserver variability for cytologic diagnosis between two observers showed good agreement (kappa = 0.44). Using DL, we observed the expected changes in tamoxifen-related biomarkers; however, poor reproducibility of biomarkers in the observation group, the 53% attrition rate of subjects from recruitment to biomarker analyses, and the expense of DL are significant barriers to the use of this procedure for biomarker assessment over time.
用于测量乳腺特异性生物标志物的连续上皮采样有效方法,将有助于对新的预防性干预措施进行快速评估。我们在此报告一项原理验证性2期研究,以评估导管灌洗(DL)用于测量他莫昔芬作用生物标志物的效用。我们招募了乳腺癌5年风险估计>1.6%的女性,或T1a或T1b期乳腺癌女性的未受影响乳房。入组进行DL后,参与者选择他莫昔芬或观察,并在6个月后接受重复DL。样本进行细胞学处理,并对雌激素受体α、Ki-67和环氧化酶-2进行免疫组织化学检测。在招募的182名女性中,115名(63%)进行了入组和重复DL;85名(47%)在两个时间点均有来自≥1条导管的足够细胞用于分析;78名(43%)在≥1对匹配导管中有足够细胞。46名女性选择观察,39名选择他莫昔芬。我们观察到,他莫昔芬组的Ki-67(校正P = 0.03)和雌激素受体α(校正P = 0.07)降低幅度大于观察组,但环氧化酶-2(校正P = 0.4)标记无差异。细胞学结果显示,与观察组相比,他莫昔芬组有改善趋势。两名观察者之间细胞学诊断的观察者间变异性显示出良好的一致性(kappa = 0.44)。使用DL,我们观察到了他莫昔芬相关生物标志物的预期变化;然而,观察组生物标志物的重现性差、从招募到生物标志物分析的受试者损耗率为53%以及DL的费用,是长期使用该程序进行生物标志物评估的重大障碍。