Suppr超能文献

导管灌洗在高危女性中是一种效率低下的生物标志物测量方法。

Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women.

作者信息

Khan Seema A, Lankes Heather A, Patil Deepa B, Bryk Michele, Hou Nanjiang, Ivancic David, Nayar Ritu, Masood Shahla, Rademaker Alfred

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Superior Street, Lurie 4-133, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Mar;2(3):265-73. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0119. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

Abstract

Effective methods of serial epithelial sampling to measure breast-specific biomarkers will aid the rapid evaluation of new preventive interventions. We report here a proof-of-principle phase 2 study to assess the utility of ductal lavage (DL) to measure biomarkers of tamoxifen action. We enrolled women with a 5-year breast cancer risk estimate >1.6% or the unaffected breast of women with T1a or T1b breast cancer. After entry DL, participants chose tamoxifen or observation and underwent repeat DL 6 months later. Samples were processed for cytology and immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor alpha, Ki-67, and cyclooxygenase-2. Of 182 women recruited, 115 (63%) underwent entry and repeat DL; 85 (47%) had sufficient cells for analysis from > or =1 duct at both time points; in 78 (43%), cells were sufficient from > or =1 matched ducts. Forty-six women chose observation and 39 chose tamoxifen. We observed greater reductions in the tamoxifen group than in the observation group for Ki-67 (adjusted P = 0.03) and estrogen receptor alpha (adjusted P = 0.07), but not in cyclooxygenase-2 (adjusted P = 0.4) labeling. Cytologic findings showed a trend toward improvement in the tamoxifen group compared with the observation group. Interobserver variability for cytologic diagnosis between two observers showed good agreement (kappa = 0.44). Using DL, we observed the expected changes in tamoxifen-related biomarkers; however, poor reproducibility of biomarkers in the observation group, the 53% attrition rate of subjects from recruitment to biomarker analyses, and the expense of DL are significant barriers to the use of this procedure for biomarker assessment over time.

摘要

用于测量乳腺特异性生物标志物的连续上皮采样有效方法,将有助于对新的预防性干预措施进行快速评估。我们在此报告一项原理验证性2期研究,以评估导管灌洗(DL)用于测量他莫昔芬作用生物标志物的效用。我们招募了乳腺癌5年风险估计>1.6%的女性,或T1a或T1b期乳腺癌女性的未受影响乳房。入组进行DL后,参与者选择他莫昔芬或观察,并在6个月后接受重复DL。样本进行细胞学处理,并对雌激素受体α、Ki-67和环氧化酶-2进行免疫组织化学检测。在招募的182名女性中,115名(63%)进行了入组和重复DL;85名(47%)在两个时间点均有来自≥1条导管的足够细胞用于分析;78名(43%)在≥1对匹配导管中有足够细胞。46名女性选择观察,39名选择他莫昔芬。我们观察到,他莫昔芬组的Ki-67(校正P = 0.03)和雌激素受体α(校正P = 0.07)降低幅度大于观察组,但环氧化酶-2(校正P = 0.4)标记无差异。细胞学结果显示,与观察组相比,他莫昔芬组有改善趋势。两名观察者之间细胞学诊断的观察者间变异性显示出良好的一致性(kappa = 0.44)。使用DL,我们观察到了他莫昔芬相关生物标志物的预期变化;然而,观察组生物标志物的重现性差、从招募到生物标志物分析的受试者损耗率为53%以及DL的费用,是长期使用该程序进行生物标志物评估的重大障碍。

相似文献

1
Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Mar;2(3):265-73. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0119. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
2
Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Nov;112(2):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9861-8. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
3
Breast ductal lavage for assessment of breast cancer biomarkers.
Horm Cancer. 2010 Aug;1(4):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0021-y.
4
Endocrine biomarkers in ductal lavage samples from women at high risk for breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):2620-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0302.
8
Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1510-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh283.

引用本文的文献

1
Early detection of breast cancer through the diagnosis of Nipple Aspirate Fluid (NAF).
Clin Proteomics. 2024 Jun 28;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12014-024-09495-4.
2
Evaluation of nipple aspirate fluid as a diagnostic tool for early detection of breast cancer.
Clin Proteomics. 2018 Jan 11;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9179-4. eCollection 2018.
3
Examination of Duct Physiology in the Human Mammary Gland.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0150653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150653. eCollection 2016.
4
Clinical trial design for testing the stem cell model for the prevention and treatment of cancer.
Cancers (Basel). 2011 Jun 20;3(2):2696-708. doi: 10.3390/cancers3022696.
5
Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2012 Sep;4(3):180-187. doi: 10.1007/s12609-012-0081-9. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
6
7
Soy isoflavone supplementation for breast cancer risk reduction: a randomized phase II trial.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Feb;5(2):309-19. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0251.
8
Breast ductal lavage for assessment of breast cancer biomarkers.
Horm Cancer. 2010 Aug;1(4):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0021-y.
9
Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1712-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1465-4. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
10
Status of Intraductal Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2010 Jun;2(2):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12609-010-0015-3. Epub 2010 May 6.

本文引用的文献

3
Reduction in proliferation with six months of letrozole in women on hormone replacement therapy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Nov;106(1):75-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9476-5. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
4
The importance of cytologic intrarater and interrater reproducibility: the case of ductal lavage.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Dec;15(12):2553-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0578.
5
Atypia and Ki-67 expression from ductal lavage in women at different risk for breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jul;15(7):1311-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0810.
7
Endocrine biomarkers in ductal lavage samples from women at high risk for breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):2620-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0302.
8
Ductal lavage findings in women with mammographic microcalcifications undergoing biopsy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep;12(9):689-96. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.04.037. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
9
Ki-67 expression in benign breast ductal cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Apr;14(4):786-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0239.
10
Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1510-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh283.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验