Labiche Alexandre, Elie Nicolas, Herlin Paulette, Denoux Yves, Crouet Hubert, Heutte Natacha, Joly Florence, Héron Jean-François, Gauduchon Pascal, Henry-Amar Michel
Groupe Régional d'Etudes sur le Cancer (GRECAN - EA 1772, IFR 146 ICORE), Université de Caen-Basse Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Histol Histopathol. 2009 Apr;24(4):425-35. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.425.
The prognostic significance of microvessel density in ovarian cancer is still a matter of debate. Classically, the degree of vascularisation is assessed in areas of high vascular density (hot spots), considered as regions of increased probability of metastasis. Since ovarian tumours have a particular progression and dissemination behaviour, vascularisation outside hot spots may also contribute to their evolution.
In the present study, the degree of tumour vascularisation was estimated both in whole histogical sections and in hot spots, in 235 patients with ovarian carcinoma, using fully automatic image analysis methods. Six parameters were estimated: mean microvessel density (MVD) and mean microvessel surface fraction (MSP) on the whole section, mean and maximum values of MVD and MSP inside hot spots (MVDHS1, MSPHS1 and MVDHS2, MSPHS2). Relationships between vascular parameters and clinicopathologic features were analysed.
In stage III-IV patients multivariate analysis showed that stage IV disease (hazards ratio (HR)=1.72, p=0.001), post-surgical residual disease 1cm (HR=2.86, p<0.001), upper MVD tercile (HR=1.45, p<0.022) and medial MVDHS1 tercile (HR=1.36, p=0.060) retained an independent prognostic value upon overall survival.
Our results suggest that quantification of blood vessels, both on the whole histological section and in hot spots might be helpful in evaluating prognosis in advanced ovarian carcinomas.
微血管密度在卵巢癌中的预后意义仍存在争议。传统上,血管生成程度是在高血管密度区域(热点)进行评估的,这些区域被认为是转移概率增加的区域。由于卵巢肿瘤具有特殊的进展和扩散行为,热点以外的血管生成也可能对其演变有影响。
在本研究中,使用全自动图像分析方法,对235例卵巢癌患者的整个组织切片和热点区域的肿瘤血管生成程度进行了评估。评估了六个参数:整个切片上的平均微血管密度(MVD)和平均微血管表面积分数(MSP),热点区域内MVD和MSP的平均值和最大值(MVDHS1、MSPHS1和MVDHS2、MSPHS2)。分析了血管参数与临床病理特征之间的关系。
在Ⅲ - Ⅳ期患者中,多因素分析显示,Ⅳ期疾病(风险比(HR)=1.72,p = 0.001)、术后残留病灶≥1cm(HR = 2.86,p < 0.001)、MVD上三分位数(HR = 1.45,p < 0.022)和MVDHS1中位数三分位数(HR = 1.36,p = 0.060)对总生存期具有独立的预后价值。
我们的结果表明,对整个组织切片和热点区域的血管进行量化,可能有助于评估晚期卵巢癌的预后。