Dain Stephen J, Wood Joanne M, Atchison David A
FAAO School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;86(4):e296-305. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318199d1da.
To determine (a) the effect of different sunglass tint colorations on traffic signal detection and recognition for color normal and color deficient observers, and (b) the adequacy of coloration requirements in current sunglass standards.
Twenty color-normals and 49 color-deficient males performed a tracking task while wearing sunglasses of different colorations (clear, gray, green, yellow-green, yellow-brown, red-brown). At random intervals, simulated traffic light signals were presented against a white background at 5 degrees to the right or left and observers were instructed to identify signal color (red/yellow/green) by pressing a response button as quickly as possible; response times and response errors were recorded.
Signal color and sunglass tint had significant effects on response times and error rates (p < 0.05), with significant between-color group differences and interaction effects. Response times for color deficient people were considerably slower than color normals for both red and yellow signals for all sunglass tints, but for green signals they were only noticeably slower with the green and yellow-green lenses. For most of the color deficient groups, there were recognition errors for yellow signals combined with the yellow-green and green tints. In addition, deuteranopes had problems for red signals combined with red-brown and yellow-brown tints, and protanopes had problems for green signals combined with the green tint and for red signals combined with the red-brown tint.
Many sunglass tints currently permitted for drivers and riders cause a measurable decrement in the ability of color deficient observers to detect and recognize traffic signals. In general, combinations of signals and sunglasses of similar colors are of particular concern. This is prima facie evidence of a risk in the use of these tints for driving and cautions against the relaxation of coloration limits in sunglasses beyond those represented in the study.
确定(a)不同太阳镜镜片颜色对色觉正常和色觉缺陷观察者交通信号检测与识别的影响,以及(b)当前太阳镜标准中颜色要求的充分性。
20名色觉正常者和49名色觉缺陷男性佩戴不同颜色(透明、灰色、绿色、黄绿色、黄棕色、红棕色)的太阳镜执行跟踪任务。以随机间隔,在白色背景上于右侧或左侧5度处呈现模拟交通信号灯信号,要求观察者尽快按下响应按钮识别信号颜色(红/黄/绿);记录响应时间和响应错误。
信号颜色和太阳镜镜片颜色对响应时间和错误率有显著影响(p<0.05),存在显著的颜色组间差异和交互作用。对于所有太阳镜镜片颜色,色觉缺陷者对红色和黄色信号的响应时间比色觉正常者慢得多,但对于绿色信号,仅在佩戴绿色和黄绿色镜片时明显更慢。对于大多数色觉缺陷组,佩戴黄绿色和绿色镜片时对黄色信号存在识别错误。此外,绿色盲者佩戴红棕色和黄棕色镜片时对红色信号有识别问题,红色盲者佩戴绿色镜片时对绿色信号以及佩戴红棕色镜片时对红色信号有识别问题。
目前允许驾驶员和骑行者使用的许多太阳镜镜片颜色会使色觉缺陷观察者检测和识别交通信号的能力出现可测量的下降。一般来说,信号颜色与太阳镜颜色相似的组合尤其值得关注。这初步证明了使用这些颜色镜片驾驶存在风险,并警示不要放宽太阳镜颜色限制,超出本研究中的规定范围。