Suppr超能文献

复发性卵巢癌的手术治疗:腹膜癌的作用:关于腹膜癌危险因素、手术意义及预后价值的DESKTOP I试验探索性分析

Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: role of peritoneal carcinomatosis: exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial about risk factors, surgical implications, and prognostic value of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

作者信息

Harter P, Hahmann M, Lueck H J, Poelcher M, Wimberger P, Ortmann O, Canzler U, Richter B, Wagner U, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loibl S, Meier W, Huober J, Fink D, Schroeder W, Muenstedt K, Schmalfeldt B, Emons G, du Bois A

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, HSK, Dr Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1324-30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0357-0. Epub 2009 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Almost all retrospective trials pointed out that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a macroscopic complete resection could be achieved. Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported to be either a negative predictor for resectability or a negative prognostic factor, or both. The role of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a multicenter trial was investigated.

METHODS

Exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I trial (multicenter trial of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer, 2000 to 2003).

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (50%) who underwent surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Univariate analyses showed worse overall survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with patients without carcinomatosis (P < .0001). Patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis had a complete resection rate of 26% and 74%, respectively (P < .0001). This corresponded with the observation that patients with complete resection had a better prognosis than those with minimal residual disease of 1 to 5 mm, which commonly reflects peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .0002). However, patients who underwent complete resection, despite peritoneal carcinomatosis, had a 2-year survival rate of 77%, which was similar to the 2-year survival rate of patients with completely debulked disease who did not have peritoneal carcinomatosis (81%) (P = .96). Analysis of prognostic factors did not show any independent effect of peritoneal carcinomatosis on survival in patients who underwent complete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.

摘要

背景

几乎所有回顾性试验均指出,复发性卵巢癌手术的获益可能仅限于能够实现宏观完全切除的患者。据报道,腹膜癌转移要么是可切除性的负面预测指标,要么是负面预后因素,或者两者皆是。本研究调查了腹膜癌转移在一项多中心试验中的作用。

方法

对DESKTOP I试验(2000年至2003年复发性卵巢癌患者手术的多中心试验)进行探索性分析。

结果

共有125例(50%)接受复发性卵巢癌手术的患者存在腹膜癌转移。单因素分析显示,与无癌转移的患者相比,有腹膜癌转移的患者总生存期更差(P <.0001)。有和没有腹膜癌转移的患者完全切除率分别为26%和74%(P <.0001)。这与以下观察结果相符,即完全切除的患者比残留病灶最小为1至5毫米(通常反映腹膜癌转移)的患者预后更好(P =.0002)。然而,尽管存在腹膜癌转移但接受了完全切除的患者2年生存率为77%,这与无腹膜癌转移且肿瘤完全减灭的患者的2年生存率(81%)相似(P =.96)。预后因素分析未显示腹膜癌转移对接受完全切除的患者的生存有任何独立影响。

结论

腹膜癌转移是完全切除的负面预测指标,但如果能够实现完全切除,则对预后没有影响。提高手术技巧可能是增加可能从复发性疾病手术中获益的患者比例的一个步骤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验