Shidahara Miho, Seki Chie, Naganawa Mika, Sakata Muneyuki, Ishikawa Masatomo, Ito Hiroshi, Kanno Iwao, Ishiwata Kiichi, Kimura Yuichi
National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Molecular Imaging Center, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Feb;23(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0226-0. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
To reduce variance of the total volume of distribution (V (T)) image, we improved likelihood estimation in graphical analysis (LEGA) for dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) images using maximum a posteriori (MAP).
In our proposed MAP estimation in graphical analysis (MEGA), a set of time-activity curves (TACs) was formed with V (T) varying in physiological range as a template, and then the most similar TAC was sought out for a given measured TAC in a feature space. In simulation, MEGA was compared with other three methods, Logan graphical analysis (GA), multilinear analysis (MA1), and LEGA using 500 noisy TACs, under each of seven physiological conditions (from 9.9 to 61.5 of V (T)). PET studies of [(11)C]SA4503 were performed in three healthy volunteers. In clinical studies, the V (T) images estimated from MEGA were compared with region of interest (ROI) estimates from a nonlinear least square (NLS) fitting over four brain regions.
In the simulation study, the estimated V (T) by GA had a large underestimation (y = 0.27x + 8.72, r (2) = 0.87). Applying the other methods (MA1, LEGA, and MEGA), these noise-induced biases were improved (y = 0.80x + 4.04, r (2) = 0.98; y = 0.85x + 3.05, r (2) = 0.99; y = 0.96x + 1.21, r (2) = 0.99, respectively). MA1 and LEGA produced increased variance of the estimated V (T) in clinical studies. However, MEGA improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in V (T) images with linear correlations between ROI estimates with NLS (y = 0.87x + 5.1, r (2) = 0.96).
MEGA was validated as an alternative strategy of LEGA to improve estimates of V (T) in clinical PET imaging.
为降低分布总体积(V(T))图像的方差,我们使用最大后验概率(MAP)改进了动态正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像的图形分析似然估计(LEGA)。
在我们提出的图形分析MAP估计(MEGA)中,以生理范围内变化的V(T)作为模板形成一组时间-活度曲线(TAC),然后在特征空间中为给定的测量TAC寻找最相似的TAC。在模拟中,使用500条噪声TAC,在七种生理条件(V(T)从9.9到61.5)下,将MEGA与其他三种方法进行比较,即洛根图形分析(GA)、多线性分析(MA1)和LEGA。对三名健康志愿者进行了[(11)C]SA4503的PET研究。在临床研究中,将MEGA估计的V(T)图像与四个脑区非线性最小二乘(NLS)拟合的感兴趣区(ROI)估计值进行比较。
在模拟研究中,GA估计的V(T)有较大低估(y = 0.27x + 8.72,r(2) = 0.87)。应用其他方法(MA1、LEGA和MEGA),这些噪声引起的偏差得到改善(分别为y = 0.80x + 4.04,r(2) = 0.98;y = 0.85x + 3.05,r(2) = 0.99;y = 0.96x + 1.21,r(2) = 0.99)。在临床研究中,MA1和LEGA使估计的V(T)方差增加。然而,MEGA提高了V(T)图像的信噪比(SNR),ROI估计值与NLS之间存在线性相关性(y = 0.87x + 5.1,r(2) = 0.96)。
MEGA被验证为LEGA的替代策略,可改善临床PET成像中V(T)的估计。