Miller Ross H, Hamill Joseph
Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2009 Aug;12(4):481-90. doi: 10.1080/10255840802695437.
Biomechanical aspects of running injuries are often inferred from external loading measurements. However, previous research has suggested that relationships between external loading and potential injury-inducing internal loads can be complex and nonintuitive. Further, the loading response to training interventions can vary widely between subjects. In this study, we use a subject-specific computer simulation approach to estimate internal and external loading of the distal tibia during the impact phase for two runners when running in shoes with different midsole cushioning parameters. The results suggest that: (1) changes in tibial loading induced by footwear are not reflected by changes in ground reaction force (GRF) magnitudes; (2) the GRF loading rate is a better surrogate measure of tibial loading and stress fracture risk than the GRF magnitude; and (3) averaging results across groups may potentially mask differential responses to training interventions between individuals.
跑步损伤的生物力学方面通常是从外部负荷测量中推断出来的。然而,先前的研究表明,外部负荷与潜在的致伤内部负荷之间的关系可能很复杂且不符合直觉。此外,训练干预的负荷反应在个体之间可能有很大差异。在本研究中,我们使用特定个体的计算机模拟方法,来估计两名跑步者在穿着具有不同中底缓冲参数的鞋子跑步时,在着地阶段胫骨远端的内部和外部负荷。结果表明:(1)鞋类引起的胫骨负荷变化并未通过地面反作用力(GRF)大小的变化反映出来;(2)与GRF大小相比,GRF负荷率是胫骨负荷和应力性骨折风险的更好替代指标;(3)对各群体的结果进行平均可能会掩盖个体之间对训练干预的不同反应。