Anderson Warwick
Department of History and Center for Values, Ethics and Law in Medicine, School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Soc Stud Sci. 2008 Oct;38(5):785-800. doi: 10.1177/0306312708090798.
This essay examines the efforts of social scientists and humanities scholars to teach students at a major US medical school about 'race'. The objectives were to explain that race is no longer considered a biologically legitimate concept and to demonstrate that race remains an influential social classification, causing social and biological harm. That is, these educators sought to reframe the medical significance of race. An examination of the email discussions of those involved in this teaching exercise (which included the author) reveals concerns over the credibility of social scientists and humanities scholars speaking on genetics in the modern medical school. It also indicates the intellectual and curricular marginalization of critiques of racial classification in medical education. In science studies journals one can read convincing deconstructions of the new genetics of race, but it is rare to find an analysis of how ideas about race figure in the mundane practice of educating future medical doctors and researchers. Through examination of an exemplary, wide-ranging discussion of an attempt to teach on race in the medical curriculum, this essay addresses the disciplinary and institutional difficulties of translating critiques of controversial science into pedagogy.
本文探讨了社会科学家和人文学者在美国一所主要医学院向学生讲授“种族”相关内容所做的努力。其目的是解释种族不再被视为一个生物学上合理的概念,并证明种族仍然是一种有影响力的社会分类,会造成社会和生物层面的危害。也就是说,这些教育工作者试图重新界定种族在医学上的意义。对参与此次教学活动的人员(包括作者)的电子邮件讨论进行审视后发现,人们对社会科学家和人文学者在现代医学院讲授遗传学的可信度存在担忧。这也表明了医学教育中对种族分类批判在知识和课程方面处于边缘地位。在科学研究期刊中,人们可以读到对新的种族遗传学的令人信服的解构,但很少能找到关于种族观念在培养未来医生和研究人员的日常教育实践中如何体现的分析。通过审视医学课程中一次关于讲授种族问题的典型且广泛的讨论,本文探讨了将对有争议科学的批判转化为教学法在学科及机构层面所面临 的困难。