Schaffer Gavin
University of Portsmouth, School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies.
Br J Hist Sci. 2005 Sep;38(138 Pt 3):307-24. doi: 10.1017/s0007087405006990.
Historians of science have often presented the inter-war period as a time when British scientific communities radically questioned existing scholarship on 'race'. The ascendancy of genetics, and the perceived need to challenge Nazi 'racial' theory have ben highlighted as pivotal issues in shaping this British revision of 'racial' ideas. This article offers a detailed analysis of British scientific thinking in the inter-war period. It questions whether historians have exaggerated or oversimplified the prevalence of anti-'racial' reform. It uses a wide range of scientific writings to consider issues of continuity and change in 'racial' thinking in mainstream British scientific communities. The article probes the relationship between science and politics, focusing on the extent to which ideological factors affected both the scientific agenda and conclusions as regards 'racial' issues. Far from dismissing the idea that events in the inter-war period triggered changes in the way in which British scientists dealt with 'race', the article argues that the seeds of the post-Second World War international scientific rejection of 'race' were sown in inter-war Britain amid considerable ambivalence and discord.
科学史学家常常将两次世界大战之间的时期描述为英国科学界对现有“种族”学术研究进行彻底质疑的时期。遗传学的崛起以及人们认为有必要挑战纳粹“种族”理论,被视为塑造英国对“种族”观念进行这种修正的关键问题。本文对两次世界大战之间时期的英国科学思维进行了详细分析。它质疑历史学家是否夸大或过度简化了反“种族”改革的盛行程度。它运用了广泛的科学著作来探讨英国主流科学界“种族”思维中的连续性和变化问题。本文探究科学与政治之间的关系,重点关注意识形态因素在多大程度上影响了关于“种族”问题的科学议程和结论。本文远非否定两次世界大战之间的事件引发了英国科学家处理“种族”问题方式的变化这一观点,而是认为第二次世界大战后国际科学界对“种族”的摒弃种子,是在两次世界大战之间矛盾重重、分歧不断的英国播下的。