Suppr超能文献

卡马西平和苯妥英对健康成年人的认知影响比较

Comparative cognitive effects of carbamazepine and phenytoin in healthy adults.

作者信息

Meador K J, Loring D W, Allen M E, Zamrini E Y, Moore E E, Abney O L, King D W

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-3200.

出版信息

Neurology. 1991 Oct;41(10):1537-40. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.10.1537.

Abstract

We investigated neuropsychological effects of carbamazepine and phenytoin in 21 healthy adults using a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover design and treating each subject with each drug for 1 month, separated by a 1-month washout. There were neuropsychological evaluations at baseline, the end of each treatment month, and 1 month after the last treatment phase. Cognitive measures included Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Selective Reminding Test, Complex Figures, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Stroop, Finger Tapping, Grooved Pegboard, Choice Reaction Time, P3 Event-Related Potential, Hopkins Symptom Checklist, and Profile of Mood States (POMS). Compared with nondrug conditions, the anticonvulsants significantly impaired Stroop, Choice Reaction Time, Grooved Pegboard, Hopkins, and POMS. Employing anticonvulsant blood levels as covariates, there were only two significant differences between drugs, one in favor of carbamazepine (ie, Finger Tapping) and one in favor of phenytoin (ie, Stroop). The results suggest that differences in cognitive effects of carbamazepine and phenytoin are not clinically significant.

摘要

我们采用随机、双盲、双交叉设计,对21名健康成年人进行了卡马西平和苯妥英钠的神经心理学效应研究,让每位受试者服用每种药物1个月,中间间隔1个月的洗脱期。在基线、每个治疗月结束时以及最后一个治疗阶段结束后1个月进行神经心理学评估。认知测量包括符号数字模态测试、选择性提醒测试、复杂图形测试、听觉节律加法测试、斯特鲁普测试、手指敲击测试、有槽钉板测试、选择反应时测试、P3事件相关电位、霍普金斯症状清单以及情绪状态剖面图(POMS)。与未用药状态相比,抗惊厥药物显著损害了斯特鲁普测试、选择反应时测试、有槽钉板测试、霍普金斯症状清单和情绪状态剖面图的结果。将抗惊厥药物的血药浓度作为协变量,两种药物之间仅有两个显著差异,一个有利于卡马西平(即手指敲击测试),另一个有利于苯妥英钠(即斯特鲁普测试)。结果表明,卡马西平和苯妥英钠在认知效应上的差异在临床上并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验