Cheng R, Zhou X-D, Liu Z, Yang H, Gao Q-H, Hu T
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Int Endod J. 2009 Mar;42(3):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01505.x.
To compare stress distribution within roots having curved canals prepared by three preparation techniques when subjected to occlusal loads and condensation loads as a consequence of different filling techniques.
Three preparation techniques (crown-down, step-back and reverse-flaring) were compared by finite element analysis (FEA). Based on an established FEA model within curved canal, three modified models prepared by different preparation techniques were established by replacing original canal with prepared ones. FEA was performed to investigate the stress distribution under occlusal forces, which were simulated by loads of 500 N in four directions (buccal, lingual, mesial and distal), at 0 (vertical), 30, 45 and 60 degrees to the longitudinal axis of the tooth. In addition, vertical and lateral condensation processes at the curvature were simulated to determine the influence of different canal filling techniques on stress distribution.
When the occlusal and the filling loads were applied, stress distribution around the curvature and the orifice had little change on the three modified prepared models. The reverse-flaring technique resulted in the least stress with the lateral condensation process. In the case of vertical condensation, the maximum von Mises stress (46.205 MPa) occurred near the loading site. The model also revealed a tendency for stress concentration (30.635 MPa) just below the compacting level.
The study confirms that appropriate canal preparation techniques in simulated curved canals have little influence on stress distribution around the curvature or the orifice. However, vertical compaction induced high stress in the region just below the loading site.
比较三种根管预备技术预备的弯曲根管在承受咬合负荷和因不同充填技术产生的压缩负荷时牙根内的应力分布情况。
采用有限元分析(FEA)比较三种根管预备技术(冠向下、逐步后退和反扩)。基于已建立的弯曲根管有限元模型,通过将原始根管替换为预备后的根管,建立三种不同预备技术的改良模型。进行有限元分析以研究在咬合力量下的应力分布,咬合力量通过在四个方向(颊侧、舌侧、近中侧和远中侧)施加500 N的负荷进行模拟,负荷方向与牙齿纵轴呈0(垂直)、30、45和60度。此外,模拟了弯曲处的垂直和侧向充填过程,以确定不同根管充填技术对应力分布的影响。
当施加咬合和充填负荷时,三种改良预备模型在弯曲处和根管口周围的应力分布变化不大。反扩技术在侧向充填过程中产生的应力最小。在垂直充填的情况下,最大等效应力(46.205 MPa)出现在加载部位附近。模型还显示在压实水平下方有应力集中的趋势(30.635 MPa)。
该研究证实,在模拟弯曲根管中采用适当的根管预备技术对弯曲处或根管口周围的应力分布影响不大。然而,垂直压实会在加载部位下方区域产生高应力。