Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northwestern University, 201 East Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611-2968, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Mar;11(2):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0017-9.
Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients at an experienced center, assuming the likelihood for repair is > or = 90%. This has raised the question of how you define an experienced center (or surgeon). This article describes thoughts on the criteria that should make up a Center of Excellence: surgical training; intraoperative echocardiography; high volume; cardiology involvement; audit of clinical outcomes and outcomes of repair; and associated surgery for atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. High-volume programs (> or = 140 mitral valve operations per year) have the lowest mortality and highest repair rate. Although some pathologic conditions may be repaired with a high degree of certainty by experienced (nonreferent) surgeons, considerable variation still exists. Recent publications of repair rates and outcomes using minimally invasive surgery and conventional surgery highlight this variability.
最近的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南建议在经验丰富的中心对无症状患者进行二尖瓣修复,假设修复的可能性> = 90%。这就提出了如何定义经验丰富的中心(或外科医生)的问题。本文介绍了构成卓越中心的标准的想法:手术培训;术中超声心动图;高容量;心脏病学参与;临床结果和修复结果的审核;以及房颤和三尖瓣反流的相关手术。高容量项目(每年> = 140 例二尖瓣手术)的死亡率最低,修复率最高。尽管一些病理情况可能由经验丰富的(非参考)外科医生高度确定地修复,但仍存在相当大的差异。最近发表的使用微创手术和传统手术修复率和结果的出版物突出了这种可变性。