Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Aridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, General Segura 1, Almería, Spain.
J Evol Biol. 2009 May;22(5):954-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01707.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism (SSD). Among them, the gravity hypothesis (GH) explains that extreme SSD has evolved in spiders because smaller males have a mating or survival advantage by climbing faster. However, few studies have supported this hypothesis thus far. Using a wide span of spider body sizes, we show that there is an optimal body size (7.4 mm) for climbing and that extreme SSD evolves only in spiders that: (1) live in high-habitat patches and (2) in which females are larger than the optimal size. We report that the evidence for the GH across studies depends on whether the body size of individuals expands beyond the optimal climbing size. We also present an ad hoc biomechanical model that shows how the higher stride frequency of small animals predicts an optimal body size for climbing.
已经提出了几种假说来解释极端性二型性(SSD)的进化。其中,重力假说(GH)解释说,较小的雄性由于攀爬速度更快而具有交配或生存优势,因此蜘蛛中出现了极端 SSD。但是,到目前为止,很少有研究支持这一假说。我们使用了广泛的蜘蛛体型范围,表明存在一个最佳的攀爬体型(7.4 毫米),并且只有当蜘蛛:(1)生活在高栖息地斑块中,并且(2)雌性体型大于最佳体型时,才会出现极端 SSD。我们报告说,GH 的证据取决于个体的体型是否超过最佳攀爬体型。我们还提出了一个特定的生物力学模型,该模型说明了小动物的更高步频如何预测最佳的攀爬体型。