Chepurny Oleg G, Leech Colin A, Kelley Grant G, Dzhura Igor, Dzhura Elvira, Li Xiangquan, Rindler Michael J, Schwede Frank, Genieser Hans G, Holz George G
Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2009 Apr 17;284(16):10728-36. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900166200. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
To ascertain the identities of cyclic nucleotide-binding proteins that mediate the insulin secretagogue action of cAMP, the possible contributions of the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) and protein kinase A (PKA) were evaluated in a pancreatic beta cell line (rat INS-1 cells). Assays of Rap1 activation, CREB phosphorylation, and PKA-dependent gene expression were performed in combination with live cell imaging and high throughput screening of a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based cAMP sensor (Epac1-camps) to validate the selectivity with which acetoxymethyl esters (AM-esters) of cAMP analogs preferentially activate Epac or PKA. Selective activation of Epac or PKA was achieved following exposure of INS-1 cells to 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM or Bt(2)cAMP-AM, respectively. Both cAMP analogs exerted dose-dependent and glucose metabolism-dependent actions to stimulate insulin secretion, and when each was co-administered with the other, a supra-additive effect was observed. Because 2.4-fold more insulin was secreted in response to a saturating concentration (10 microm) of Bt(2)cAMP-AM as compared with 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM, and because the action of Bt(2)cAMP-AM but not 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM was nearly abrogated by treatment with 3 microm of the PKA inhibitor H-89, it is concluded that for INS-1 cells, it is PKA that acts as the dominant cAMP-binding protein in support of insulin secretion. Unexpectedly, 10-100 microm of the non-AM-ester of 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP failed to stimulate insulin secretion and was a weak activator of Rap1 in INS-1 cells. Moreover, 10 microm of the AM-ester of 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP stimulated insulin secretion from mouse islets, whereas the non-AM-ester did not. Thus, the membrane permeability of 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP in insulin-secreting cells is so low as to limit its biological activity. It is concluded that prior reports documenting the failure of 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP to act in beta cells, or other cell types, need to be re-evaluated through the use of the AM-ester of this cAMP analog.
为了确定介导cAMP胰岛素促分泌作用的环核苷酸结合蛋白的身份,我们在胰腺β细胞系(大鼠INS-1细胞)中评估了直接由cAMP激活的交换蛋白(Epac)和蛋白激酶A(PKA)的可能作用。结合活细胞成像和基于荧光共振能量转移的cAMP传感器(Epac1-camps)的高通量筛选,进行了Rap1激活、CREB磷酸化和PKA依赖性基因表达的测定,以验证cAMP类似物的乙酰氧基甲酯(AM酯)优先激活Epac或PKA的选择性。分别将INS-1细胞暴露于8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM或Bt(2)cAMP-AM后,实现了对Epac或PKA的选择性激活。两种cAMP类似物均发挥剂量依赖性和葡萄糖代谢依赖性作用来刺激胰岛素分泌,当将它们共同给予彼此时,观察到超加性效应。由于与8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM相比,饱和浓度(10 μM)的Bt(2)cAMP-AM刺激分泌的胰岛素多2.4倍,并且由于用3 μM的PKA抑制剂H-89处理几乎消除了Bt(2)cAMP-AM而非8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP-AM的作用,因此得出结论,对于INS-1细胞,PKA是支持胰岛素分泌的主要cAMP结合蛋白。出乎意料的是,10 - 100 μM的8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP非AM酯未能刺激INS-1细胞中的胰岛素分泌,并且是Rap1的弱激活剂。此外,10 μM的8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP AM酯刺激小鼠胰岛分泌胰岛素,而非AM酯则不能。因此,8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP在胰岛素分泌细胞中的膜通透性非常低,以至于限制了其生物活性。得出的结论是,先前记录8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP在β细胞或其他细胞类型中不起作用的报道需要通过使用这种cAMP类似物的AM酯来重新评估。