Richards Graham
Passau Schr Psychologiegesch. 2005;13:193-202.
During the latter half of the 20th century it tended to be taken for granted within Psychology that "nativist" or "hereditarian" theoretical positions were intrinsically right-wing in their ideological connotations, while those of "environmentalist" positions were left-wing. In this paper, written from the perspective of a critical historian of Psychology, it is suggested that this is too simplistic. As popularly understood, the term "instinct" has at least three meanings, which differ considerably in their ethical register. It is argued that in none of these senses can unambiguous ideological implications can be drawn.
在20世纪后半叶,心理学界倾向于理所当然地认为,“先天论者”或“遗传论者”的理论立场在意识形态内涵上本质上是右翼的,而“环境论者”立场的理论则是左翼的。在本文中,从一位批判性的心理学历史学家的角度出发,有人认为这种观点过于简单化。按照通常的理解,“本能”这个词至少有三种含义,它们在道德层面上有很大差异。有人认为,从这些含义中都无法得出明确的意识形态含义。