Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的事实与争议

Facts and controversies of aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

作者信息

Faxon David P, Freedman Jane E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):412-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.019.

Abstract

Because of the central role of platelets in mediating ischemic events, antiplatelet agents are critical components of atherothrombosis prevention. Given their robust safety and efficacy profiles, aspirin and clopidogrel are consistently recommended by evidence-based treatment guidelines. Despite these recommendations, controversies surrounding the appropriate application of aspirin and clopidogrel remain. Questions of appropriate dosing, length of therapy, and use of combination therapy are most pressing, and considerable debate exists regarding the variability of response to antiplatelet therapy, including the definition, measurement, and clinical relevance of responsiveness. This review discusses the facts and controversies surrounding the use of aspirin and clopidogrel. Overall, despite the existing controversies, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and/or clopidogrel remains a proven and essential therapeutic tool for safe and effective management of atherothrombotic risk in specific clinical settings.

摘要

由于血小板在介导缺血事件中发挥核心作用,抗血小板药物是预防动脉粥样硬化血栓形成的关键组成部分。鉴于其强大的安全性和有效性,基于证据的治疗指南一直推荐使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷。尽管有这些推荐,但围绕阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的适当应用仍存在争议。最紧迫的问题是合适的剂量、治疗时长以及联合治疗的使用,并且关于抗血小板治疗反应的变异性,包括反应性的定义、测量和临床相关性,存在大量争论。本综述讨论了围绕阿司匹林和氯吡格雷使用的事实与争议。总体而言,尽管存在现有争议,但在特定临床环境中,使用阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷进行抗血小板治疗仍然是安全有效管理动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险的已证实且必不可少的治疗工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验