Suppr超能文献

与接触预防措施相关的不良结局:文献综述

Adverse outcomes associated with Contact Precautions: a review of the literature.

作者信息

Morgan Daniel J, Diekema Daniel J, Sepkowitz Kent, Perencevich Eli N

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2009 Mar;37(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact Precautions (CP) are a standard method for preventing patient-to-patient transmission of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings. With the ongoing worldwide concern for MDROs including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and broadened use of active surveillance programs, an increasing number of patients are being placed on CP. Whereas few would argue that CP are an important tool in infection control, many reports and small studies have observed worse noninfectious outcomes in patients on CP. However, no review of this literature exists.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature describing adverse outcomes associated with CP. We identified 15 studies published between 1989 and 2008 relating to adverse outcomes from CP. Nine were higher quality based on standardized collection of data and/or inclusion of control groups.

RESULTS

Four main adverse outcomes related to CP were identified in this review. These included less patient-health care worker contact, changes in systems of care that produce delays and more noninfectious adverse events, increased symptoms of depression and anxiety, and decreased patient satisfaction with care.

CONCLUSION

Although CP are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an intervention to control spread of MDROs, our review of the literature demonstrates that this approach has unintended consequences that are potentially deleterious to the patient. Measures to ameliorate these deleterious consequences of CP are urgently needed.

摘要

背景

接触预防措施(CP)是医院环境中预防多重耐药菌(MDROs)在患者之间传播的一种标准方法。随着全球对包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在内的MDROs持续关注,以及主动监测项目的广泛应用,越来越多的患者被采取接触预防措施。尽管很少有人会质疑接触预防措施是感染控制的一项重要工具,但许多报告和小型研究发现,采取接触预防措施的患者出现了更差的非感染性结局。然而,目前尚无对该文献的综述。

方法

我们系统地回顾了描述与接触预防措施相关不良结局的文献。我们确定了1989年至2008年间发表的15项与接触预防措施不良结局相关的研究。其中9项研究基于标准化的数据收集和/或纳入对照组,质量较高。

结果

本综述确定了与接触预防措施相关的4种主要不良结局。这些包括患者与医护人员的接触减少、护理系统的改变导致延误和更多非感染性不良事件、抑郁和焦虑症状增加以及患者对护理的满意度降低。

结论

尽管美国疾病控制与预防中心推荐接触预防措施作为控制MDROs传播的一种干预措施,但我们对文献的综述表明,这种方法会产生意想不到的后果,可能对患者有害。迫切需要采取措施改善接触预防措施的这些有害后果。

相似文献

1
Adverse outcomes associated with Contact Precautions: a review of the literature.
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Mar;37(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257.
2
Degowning the controversies of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review.
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jan 1;44(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
4
Noninfectious Hospital Adverse Events Decline After Elimination of Contact Precautions for MRSA and VRE.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):788-796. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.93. Epub 2018 May 10.
5
Reconsidering contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1163-72. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.156. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
6
Transmission pathways of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital setting: a scoping review.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;40(4):447-456. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.359. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):559-565. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.33. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
Isolation precautions for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in healthcare settings.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;22(4):339-44. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32832d69b0.

引用本文的文献

1
Guilty by gown: reconsidering contact precautions for COVID-19.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 26;5(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10055. eCollection 2025.
2
Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 3;17(2):e78470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78470. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Is there an association between colonisation of vancomycin resistant , methicillin resistant , or and mortality in sepsis?
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Oct 26;6(4):100413. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100413. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
A call to action: the SHEA research agenda to combat healthcare-associated infections.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 25;45(9):1-18. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.125.
8
Doff Thy Gown-Shedding Contact Precautions for COVID-19.
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 26;79(3):585-587. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae276.
9
Adopting the Klein Triple Path Model of Insight for Clinical Quality Improvement.
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Feb 12;7(1):36-38. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-23-44. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not?
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 15;149(2):100-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00006.
2
Contact isolation for infection control in hospitalized patients: is patient satisfaction affected?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):275-8. doi: 10.1086/527508.
3
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007.
5
Look before you leap: active surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms.
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 15;44(8):1101-7. doi: 10.1086/512820. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
9
Impact of contact isolation on health care workers at a tertiary care center.
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Sep;34(7):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验