Suppr超能文献

综合回顾急性护理医院中多药耐药生物体的感染预防和控制计划:社会生态观点。

An integrative review of infection prevention and control programs for multidrug-resistant organisms in acute care hospitals: a socio-ecological perspective.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2011 Jun;39(5):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.07.017. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The infection rates of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are increasing in Canada and the United States. The prevention and control of MDRO infections remain an important issue in acute care hospitals. Although comprehensive infection prevention and control programs have been recommended, there is little evidence to date of their effectiveness or of what aspects are most important.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to review and critique the literature on the relationship between an MDRO infection and control program and MDRO rates in acute care hospitals.

METHODS

Studies including original research published between January 1, 1998, and May 14, 2009, were identified through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PUBMED, The Cochrane Library, and expert consultation. A comprehensive search strategy was developed with a librarian to find studies that covered the main subject areas of this integrative review.

RESULTS

Of the 1,382 papers retrieved, 47 were reviewed, and 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. The interventions in the included studies were assessed using the tier 1/tier 2 framework. A total of 18 (56.25%) studies had an administrative measure as an intervention; 20 (62.5%) studies had education and training of health care personnel; 8 (25.0%) studies had judicious use of antimicrobial agents; 17 (53.1%) studies used surveillance; 24 (75.0%) studies had infection control precautions to prevent transmission; 7 studies (21.9%) introduced environmental measures; and 9 (28.1%) studies used patient decolonization. Although all the 32 studies were quasiexperimental studies, only 2 (5.9%) studies provided sample size calculations, and only 5 studies reported confounding factors. Whereas 27 used an interrupted time series design and 2 were controlled pre- and post-intervention designs, 3 were pre- and post-intervention without control groups.

CONCLUSION

This integrative review demonstrated that the evidence of the relationship between MDRO infection prevention and control programs and the rates of MDRO is weak. Although major methodologic weaknesses exist in the published literature making it not possible to exclude other plausible explanations for the reduction of the acquisition of MDRO, the overall evidence does support the use of multiple interventions to reduce the rates of MDRO in acute care hospitals. Whereas it is unclear which bundles of interventions are effective, there is a clear suggestion that multiple simultaneous interventions can be effective in reducing MDRO infections. In addition, despite the limitations of interrupted time series, multiple studies employing active surveillance cultures were associated with reduced MDRO infections. Future individual reports of outbreaks and intervention studies should be written in a standardized manner using the recommended Outbreak Reports and Intervention Studies of Nosocomial Infection (ORION) guidelines. Further research is needed on the proposed tier 1/tier 2 framework clearly indicating all the interventions implemented.

摘要

背景

在加拿大和美国,耐多药生物体(MDRO)的感染率正在上升。急性护理医院仍然需要预防和控制 MDRO 感染。尽管已经推荐了全面的感染预防和控制计划,但迄今为止,这些计划的有效性或哪些方面最重要的证据很少。

目的

我们的目标是审查和评价 MDRO 感染和控制计划与急性护理医院 MDRO 率之间关系的文献。

方法

通过 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PUBMED、The Cochrane Library 和专家咨询,确定了 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 5 月 14 日期间发表的原始研究。与一位图书管理员共同制定了全面的搜索策略,以找到涵盖本次综合评价主要主题领域的研究。

结果

在检索到的 1382 篇论文中,有 47 篇进行了综述,32 篇研究符合纳入标准。采用第 1 层/第 2 层框架对纳入研究的干预措施进行评估。共有 18 项(56.25%)研究将行政措施作为干预措施;20 项(62.5%)研究对医护人员进行了教育和培训;8 项(25.0%)研究合理使用了抗菌药物;17 项(53.1%)研究进行了监测;24 项(75.0%)研究采取了感染控制预防措施以防止传播;7 项研究(21.9%)采用了环境措施;9 项(28.1%)研究对患者进行了去定植。尽管 32 项研究均为准实验研究,但只有 2 项(5.9%)研究提供了样本量计算,只有 5 项研究报告了混杂因素。其中,27 项研究采用了中断时间序列设计,2 项研究采用了干预前后对照设计,3 项研究为干预前后无对照设计。

结论

本次综合评价表明,MDRO 感染预防和控制计划与 MDRO 发生率之间关系的证据很薄弱。尽管已发表文献中存在主要的方法学缺陷,不能排除 MDRO 获得减少的其他合理解释,但总体证据确实支持采用多种干预措施来降低急性护理医院 MDRO 的发生率。虽然尚不清楚哪些干预措施组合有效,但有明确的证据表明,多种同时进行的干预措施可有效降低 MDRO 感染。此外,尽管中断时间序列存在局限性,但多项采用主动监测培养的研究与 MDRO 感染的减少有关。未来,应按照建议的《医院感染暴发报告和干预研究(ORION)指南》,以标准化的方式报告暴发和干预研究。需要进一步研究所提出的第 1 层/第 2 层框架,明确指出所实施的所有干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验