de Vries Annemarie C, Haringsma Jelle, de Vries Richard A, ter Borg Frank, Nagtzaam Nicole M, Steyerberg Ewout W, van Dekken Herman, Kuipers Ernst J
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.041. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
Surveillance of intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the gastric mucosa should be limited to patients at high risk of gastric cancer. Patients with extensive IM are at increased cancer risk; however, the intragastric extent of IM is usually unknown at the time of the initial diagnosis.
To assess the predictive value of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters for the intragastric extent of IM.
Prospective, multicenter study.
Eighty-eight patients with a previous diagnosis of IM of the gastric mucosa.
Surveillance gastroscopy with extensive random biopsy sampling.
Biopsy specimens were evaluated according to the Sydney classification system. In addition, serologic testing of Helicobacter pylori and cagA status, pepsinogens I and II, gastrin, and intrinsic factor antibodies was performed. The association between the available parameters and extensive IM was evaluated with logistic regression analysis.
In 51 patients (58%), IM was present in the biopsy specimens from at least 2 intragastric locations. The most important predictors of extensive IM were a family history of gastric cancer, alcohol use > or = 1 unit/d (1 glass, approximately 10 mL or 8 g ethanol), moderate or marked IM of the index biopsy specimen, and a pepsinogen I to II ratio < 3.0. A simple risk score based on these factors could identify extensive IM in 24 of 25 patients (sensitivity 96%).
A prospective cohort study should confirm the proposed risk stratification.
A risk score of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters can predict extensive intragastric IM and may serve as a practical tool to select patients for surveillance endoscopy in routine clinical practice.
胃黏膜肠化生(IM)的监测应仅限于胃癌高危患者。广泛肠化生患者的癌症风险增加;然而,在初次诊断时,肠化生的胃内范围通常并不明确。
评估临床、组织学和血清学参数对肠化生胃内范围的预测价值。
前瞻性多中心研究。
88例先前诊断为胃黏膜肠化生的患者。
进行监测性胃镜检查并广泛随机活检取样。
活检标本根据悉尼分类系统进行评估。此外,检测幽门螺杆菌和cagA状态、胃蛋白酶原I和II、胃泌素以及内因子抗体的血清学检测。通过逻辑回归分析评估可用参数与广泛肠化生之间的关联。
51例患者(58%)的活检标本中,至少在胃内2个部位存在肠化生。广泛肠化生的最重要预测因素是胃癌家族史、酒精摄入量≥1单位/天(1杯,约10毫升或8克乙醇)、索引活检标本为中度或重度肠化生以及胃蛋白酶原I与II的比值<3.0。基于这些因素的简单风险评分可在25例患者中的24例中识别出广泛肠化生(敏感性96%)。
前瞻性队列研究应证实所提出的风险分层。
临床、组织学和血清学参数的风险评分可预测广泛的胃内肠化生,并可作为在常规临床实践中选择患者进行监测性内镜检查的实用工具。