Arpino P A, Thompson B T
Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Apr;34(2):171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00982.x.
Opiates are the mainstay of analgesia in the intensive care unit (ICU). Unfortunately, constipation is a common adverse effect associated with opioid use. Naloxone is a pure opiate antagonist that is frequently utilized in practice for the prophylaxis or treatment of opiate-induced constipation in the ICU. Despite extensive first pass metabolism in the liver there remains the potential for opiate reversal after oral administration. We sought to assess the safety of enteral naloxone in the ICU for the treatment of opiate-induced constipation.
Patients who were ordered enteral naloxone while in the ICU were identified through the Pharmacy's computer system. Patients were included in the data analysis if they had received at least one dose of enteral naloxone and had received standing opiates for at least 48 h prior to the initial naloxone dose. Patients were excluded from data analysis if the Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score was not utilized, they were paralysed or the medical record indicated that extubation was planned within the following 24 h. Data points were recorder at the following times with respect to each naloxone dose administered; time -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 and 4 h. The following data points were collected before and after each naloxone dose; blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, RASS score, pain assessment score (recorded as present or absent), midazolam dose, propofol dose and fentanyl dose. In order to assess for possible opiate reversal the peak fentanyl, propofol and midazolam dose, vital sign value, RASS score and pain score were compared before and after each dose of naloxone.
The mean naloxone dose was 3.6 +/- 0.9 mg. There was no significant change in RASS score around the naloxone doses, -2.9 +/- 1.4 before and -2.8 +/- 1.6 after (P = 0.28). There were no significant changes in mean fentanyl, propofol or midazolam dose around naloxone administration. There were also no significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate or in the presence of pain.
These results demonstrate that the administration of enteral naloxone to patients on intravenous opiates in the ICU setting was not associated with changes in sedation score, vital signs, fentanyl dose, midazolam dose or propofol dose.
阿片类药物是重症监护病房(ICU)镇痛的主要药物。不幸的是,便秘是与使用阿片类药物相关的常见不良反应。纳洛酮是一种纯阿片类拮抗剂,在ICU中常用于预防或治疗阿片类药物引起的便秘。尽管在肝脏中有广泛的首过代谢,但口服给药后仍有阿片类药物逆转的可能性。我们旨在评估在ICU中肠内给予纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物引起的便秘的安全性。
通过药房的计算机系统识别在ICU期间接受肠内纳洛酮治疗的患者。如果患者接受了至少一剂肠内纳洛酮,并且在首次纳洛酮剂量之前接受常规阿片类药物治疗至少48小时,则将其纳入数据分析。如果未使用里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)评分、患者处于麻痹状态或病历表明计划在接下来的24小时内拔管,则将患者排除在数据分析之外。针对每次给予的纳洛酮剂量,在以下时间记录数据点:时间-2、-1、0、1、2和4小时。在每次纳洛酮剂量前后收集以下数据点:血压、心率、呼吸频率、RASS评分、疼痛评估评分(记录为存在或不存在)、咪达唑仑剂量、丙泊酚剂量和芬太尼剂量。为了评估可能的阿片类药物逆转情况,比较每次纳洛酮剂量前后芬太尼、丙泊酚和咪达唑仑的峰值剂量、生命体征值、RASS评分和疼痛评分。
纳洛酮的平均剂量为3.6±0.9毫克。在纳洛酮剂量前后,RASS评分无显著变化,给药前为-2.9±1.4,给药后为-2.8±1.6(P = 0.28)。在给予纳洛酮前后,芬太尼、丙泊酚或咪达唑仑的平均剂量无显著变化。心率、血压、呼吸频率或疼痛情况也无显著变化。
这些结果表明,在ICU环境中,对接受静脉阿片类药物治疗的患者给予肠内纳洛酮与镇静评分、生命体征、芬太尼剂量、咪达唑仑剂量或丙泊酚剂量的变化无关。