设定临床技能评估的及格分数。
Setting pass scores for clinical skills assessment.
作者信息
Liu Min, Liu Keh-Min
机构信息
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
出版信息
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Dec;24(12):656-63. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70032-4.
Abstract
In a clinical skills assessment, the decision to pass or fail an examinee should be based on the test content or on the examinees' performance. The process of deciding a pass score is known as setting a standard of the examination. This requires a properly selected panel of expert judges and a suitable standard setting method, which best fits the purpose of the examination. Six standard setting methods that are often used in clinical skills assessment are described to provide an overview of the standard setting process.
摘要
在临床技能评估中，判定考生通过或不通过的决定应基于考试内容或考生的表现。确定及格分数的过程被称为设定考试标准。这需要一个经过恰当挑选的专家评审小组以及一种适合考试目的的标准设定方法。本文描述了临床技能评估中常用的六种标准设定方法，以概述标准设定过程。
相似文献
1
Setting pass scores for clinical skills assessment.设定临床技能评估的及格分数。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Dec;24(12):656-63. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70032-4.
2
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持：医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.
3
Cut-scores revisited: feasibility of a new method for group standard setting.切分分数再探讨：一种新的组标准设定方法的可行性。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1238-7.
4
Procedure-specific assessment tool for flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: gathering validity evidence and setting pass-fail standards.用于柔性咽喉镜检查的特定操作评估工具：收集效度证据并设定通过/失败标准。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1649-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4971-y. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jan 2;30(1):85-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160171.
6
Effect of first-encounter pretest on pass/fail rates of a clinical skills medical licensure examination.首次接触前测对临床技能医学执照考试通过/失败率的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 May;15(2):219-27. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9193-z. Epub 2009 Sep 13.
7
Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.考生性别、标准化病人性别及其交互作用对标准化病人对考生人际和沟通技能评分的影响。
Acad Med. 1993 Feb;68(2):153-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199302000-00013.
8
Setting standards on educational tests.制定教育测试标准。
Med Educ. 2003 May;37(5):464-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01495.x.
9
Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术的居家培训
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
引用本文的文献
1
A structured multimodal teaching approach enhancing musculoskeletal physical examination skills among undergraduate medical students.一种结构化的多模态教学方法，可提高医学生的肌肉骨骼系统体格检查技能。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2114134. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2114134.
2
Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea.比较韩国医学院客观结构化临床考试中边界群体方法和边界回归方法与基于常模的标准设定的分界分数。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:25. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.25. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
3
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests.书签法和 Angoff 标准设定法在医学绩效测试中有效性的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 2;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02436-3.
本文引用的文献
1
Assess clinical competence-an overview.评估临床能力——概述。
Med Teach. 1979;1(6):289-96. doi: 10.3109/01421597909014338.
2
Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method.设定性能测试标准：三级安格夫法的初步研究
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S13-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183c683.
3
Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools.运用临界值法比较三所医学院校毕业时客观结构化临床考试的及格标准。
Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1024-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02857.x.
4
Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method.小规模客观结构化临床考试中的标准设定：改良临界组法与临界回归法的比较
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006 May;11(2):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-7853-1.
5
Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education.在健康职业教育中为能力考核设定可靠绝对及格分数的程序。
Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):50-7. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1801_11.
6
Setting a standard for performance assessment of doctor-patient communication in general practice.制定全科医疗中医患沟通绩效评估的标准。
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1244-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01918.x.
7
The effect of incorporating normative data into a criterion-referenced standard setting in medical education.将规范数据纳入医学教育中基于标准参照的标准设定的效果。
Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10 Suppl):S88-90. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00028.
8
Establishing passing standards for classroom achievement tests in medical education: a comparative study of four methods.
Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10 Suppl):S85-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00027.
9
Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations.制定客观结构化临床考试（OSCE）和标准化患者检查的合理性能标准。
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):245-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100274.
10
Setting standards on educational tests.制定教育测试标准。
Med Educ. 2003 May;37(5):464-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01495.x.
Zotero 插件