Burns John W, Quartana Phillip J, Bruehl Stephen
Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Psychosom Med. 2009 May;71(4):454-62. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318199d97f. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
To examine whether high trait anger-out chronic low back (CLBP) patients would show exceptionally large symptom-specific lower paraspinal (LP) responses, compared with healthy nonpatients, during pain induction, a subsequent mental stressor, and recovery when they were urged to suppress awareness of pain and suffering.
CLBP patients (n = 93) and nonpatients (n = 105) were assigned randomly to one of four attention strategy conditions for use during pain induction: sensory-focus, distraction, suppression, or control. All participants underwent a cold pressor, and then performed mental arithmetic. They completed the anger-out (AOS) and anger-in (AIS) subscales of the Anger Expression Inventory.
General Linear Model procedures were used to test Attention Strategy Condition x Patient/Nonpatient Status x AOS (or AIS) x Period interactions for physiological indices. Significant interactions were found such that: a) high trait anger-out patients in the Suppression condition seemed to show the greatest LP reactivity during the mental arithmetic followed by the slowest recovery compared with other conditions; b) high trait anger-out patients and nonpatients in the Suppression condition seemed to show the slowest systolic blood pressure recoveries compared with other conditions.
Results extend previous work by suggesting that an anger-out style moderates effects of how attention is allocated during pain on responses to and recovery from a subsequent mental stressor. Results provide further evidence that trait anger-out and trait anger-in among CLBP patients are associated with increased LP muscle tension during and after pain and mental stress.
研究高特质愤怒外向型慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者在疼痛诱发、随后的心理应激源以及恢复过程中(当被要求抑制对疼痛和痛苦的意识时),与健康非患者相比,是否会表现出异常大的症状特异性椎旁肌(LP)反应。
将CLBP患者(n = 93)和非患者(n = 105)随机分配到疼痛诱发期间使用的四种注意力策略条件之一:感觉聚焦、分心、抑制或对照。所有参与者都进行了冷加压试验,然后进行心算。他们完成了愤怒表达量表的愤怒外向(AOS)和愤怒内向(AIS)子量表。
使用一般线性模型程序来测试注意力策略条件×患者/非患者状态×AOS(或AIS)×时间段对生理指标的交互作用。发现了显著的交互作用,即:a)与其他条件相比,抑制条件下的高特质愤怒外向型患者在心算期间似乎表现出最大的LP反应性,随后恢复最慢;b)与其他条件相比,抑制条件下的高特质愤怒外向型患者和非患者似乎收缩压恢复最慢。
结果扩展了先前的研究工作,表明愤怒外向型风格会调节疼痛期间注意力分配方式对随后心理应激源的反应和恢复的影响。结果提供了进一步的证据,表明CLBP患者的特质愤怒外向和特质愤怒内向与疼痛和心理应激期间及之后LP肌肉张力增加有关。