Zhang Jufen, Goode Kevin M, Cuddihy Paul E, Cleland John G F
Department of Cardiology, Hull York Medical School, Kingston-upon-Hull, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, UK.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Apr;11(4):420-7. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp033. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
We sought to test the utility of weight gain algorithms to predict episodes of worsening heart failure (WHF) using home-telemonitoring data collected as part of the TEN-HMS study.
Simple rule-of-thumb (RoT) algorithms (i.e. 3 lbs in 1 day and 5 lbs in 3 days) and a moving average convergence divergence (MACD) algorithm were compared. WHF was defined as hospitalization for WHF or worsening of breathlessness or leg oedema. Of 168 patients, 45 were hospitalized with WHF and 76 were hospitalized for other reasons. On average, weight gain occurred in the 14 days prior to WHF hospitalizations but not in the 14 days prior to non-WHF hospitalizations [1.9 +/- 4.7 lbs (0.9 +/- 2.1 kg) vs. -0.4 +/- 2.5 lbs (-0.2 +/- 1.1 kg), P < 0.0001]. The true alerts rate was higher for the RoT algorithms compared with the MACD (58 and 65% vs. 20%). However, the RoT algorithms had much higher false alert rates (54 and 58% vs. 9%) rendering them of little practical use for predicting WHF events.
A MACD algorithm is more specific but less sensitive than RoT when trying to predict episodes of WHF based on daily weight measurements. However, many episodes of WHF do not appear to be associated with weight gain and therefore telemonitoring of weight alone may not have great value for heart failure management.
我们试图通过作为TEN-HMS研究一部分收集的家庭远程监测数据,测试体重增加算法预测心力衰竭恶化(WHF)发作的效用。
比较了简单的经验法则(RoT)算法(即1天内体重增加3磅和3天内体重增加5磅)和移动平均收敛背离(MACD)算法。WHF被定义为因WHF住院或呼吸急促或腿部水肿加重。在168例患者中,45例因WHF住院,76例因其他原因住院。平均而言,WHF住院前14天出现体重增加,而非WHF住院前14天未出现体重增加[1.9±4.7磅(0.9±2.1千克)对-0.4±2.5磅(-0.2±1.1千克),P<0.0001]。与MACD相比,RoT算法的真实警报率更高(58%和65%对20%)。然而,RoT算法的误报率要高得多(54%和58%对9%),这使得它们在预测WHF事件方面几乎没有实际用途。
在试图根据每日体重测量预测WHF发作时,MACD算法比RoT算法更具特异性,但敏感性较低。然而,许多WHF发作似乎与体重增加无关,因此仅对体重进行远程监测对心力衰竭管理可能没有太大价值。